Author

  • Alireza Shahraki

    • University of Sistani and Baluchistan, Zahedan, I.R.Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Hadi Zarea

    • University of Tehran, Tehran, I.R.Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Abbas Jannesari

    • University of Azad, Branch of Zahedan, Zahedan, I.R.Iran
    • Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract

Today, world competition situation is in a way that organizations need to increase the quality and increase the customer satisfaction, increase the benefit and decrease in outgoings, all at the sometime together. One side, goods prices increase and sever competition in market between goods, and on the other side, complexity in customers attitude and their vary expectations made disaster in management and share increase of the market. So, increase of effects on customer decision procedure as a new attitude in these situations born. Customer decision procedure is a kind of decision- making that is mode by the users. In general, decision-making is recognition processes through selection among different choices. How many criteria are used to analysis by the users? In addition, what kind of criteria do they consider? In addition, to what extent do they emphasize according to their favorites or goods importance. Hierarchic analysis procedure (AHP) is a decision-making with multi criteria that is suitable complex decisions, and consist of decision elements compare in where recognition of quality has encountered with problem. Ranking in decision choices of AHP is to solve the puzzle complexity AHP procedure by finding the specification through different choices, declare good buying decision.

Keywords

References

  • Best, R. J. (2002). Market-based Management, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Blattberg, R. C. & Deighton, J. (1996). Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harvard Business Review , 74(4), 136-44.
  • Blattberg, R. C., Getz, G. & Thomas, J. S. (2001). Customer Equity: Building and Managing Relationships as Valuable Assets, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing , 56(3), 55-68.
  • El-Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Gosain, S. J. & Young, K. M. (1999). IT-intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: insights from Marshall Industries. MIS Quarterly , 23(3), 305-35.
  • Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Moves: A New Approach to Profits, Growth and Renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Narver, J. C. & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing , 54(4), 20-35.
  • Ness, J. A., Schroeck, M. L., Letendre, F. R. & Douglas, W. J. (2002). CRM and customer lifetime value. Cost Management Update , 132, 1-2.
  • Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The Loyalty Effect, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Soh, C., Kien, S. S. & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM , 43(4), 47-51.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 15, 57-68.
  • Thomas, J. S. (2001). A methodology for linking customer acquisition to customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research , 38(2), 262-68.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Shahraki, A., Zarea, H., & Jannesari, A. (2012). Decision Making with Multi Criteria through Hierarchic Analysis Technique and its Effect on Customer Decision Procedure. Information Management and Business Review, 4(4), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v4i4.976

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-04-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission