Author

  • Ainaa Idayu Iskandar

    • Faculty of Business & Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Noor Rafhati Romaiha

    • Faculty of Business & Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Arnida Jahya

    • Faculty of Business & Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The virtual mode of the classroom that changes from the traditional education model poses challenges among the educators especially the inability to cope with the adaption of educational technologies. Online literacy is the basic skill to exercise an outstanding performance during changing environments. However, the conceptualization of adaptive performance seeks further exploration mainly because the past studies focus on the specific context. This study aims to present the validity and reliability of the adaptive performance construct related to online teaching platforms among Malaysian public university lecturers. The questionnaire was designed using Google Form and the adopted questionnaire was emailed to lecturers of Malaysian Research Universities (henceforth, RUs) via their institution’s email address. The data were then analyzed using the SmartPLS software through the measurement model analysis. The analysis involved a second-order approach where the outer loading values, the convergent validity of Average Variance Extracted (henceforth, AVE), and reliability analysis of the adaptive performance construct. The findings suggest that the validity and reliability of the construct were established for the context of the study. The Cronbach Alpha and composite reliability values scored above the threshold values. This study confirmed the adaptive performance instrument among the lecturers in Malaysia and can provide insight for future research. The limitation includes the sample of the study that was rather homogenous which it only focused on lecturers from Malaysian RUs.

Keywords

References

  • Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct?oriented biodata: Capturing change?related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97–111.
  • Arshad, M. N., & Ab Malik, Z. (2015). Quality of human capital and labor productivity: A Case Of Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 23(1), 37.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
  • Bakkaloglu, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Servant Leadership on Thriving at Work and Adaptive Performance. Carleton University.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/SpringerReference_7472
  • Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: a review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14–29.
  • Carpini, J. A., Parker, S. K., & Griffin, M. A. (2017). A look back and a leap forward: A review and synthesis of the individual work performance literature. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 825–885.
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699–726.
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/CJAS.232
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
  • Green, A. E., Dishop, C. R., & Aarons, G. A. (2016). Organizational Stress as Moderator of Relationship Between Mental Health Provider Adaptability and Organizational Commitment. Psychiatric Services, 67(10), 1103–1108.
  • Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2005). Are conscientious workers adaptable? Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 245–259.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
  • Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017263
  • Hair, Joe F, Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
  • Hair, Joseph F. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Jimoh, T. A., & Adenekan, T. E. (2024). Exploring the Dynamics of Digital Transformation Capabilities and Adaptive Performance of Administrative Staff in Public Tertiary Institutions, South-West Nigeria. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 4(1), 1–14.
  • Koay Chen Guan, Amalia Madihie, R. N. (2014). Relationship Between Five Personality Traits and Transformational Leadership to Adaptive Performance Among Management and Professional Officers. Retrieved from http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6769
  • Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8). Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/joem/Fulltext/2011/08000/Conceptual_Frameworks_of_Individual_Work.6.aspx
  • Loughlin, E. M., & Priyadarshini, A. (2021). Adaptability in the workplace: Investigating the adaptive performance job requirements for a project manager. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100012
  • Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 1534484319836315.
  • Ployhart, R., & Bliese, P. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. In Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments (pp. 3–39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06001-7
  • Pradhan, R. K., Jena, L. K., & Singh, S. K. (2017). Examining the role of emotional intelligence between organizational learning and adaptive performance in Indian manufacturing industries. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-05-2016-0046
  • Pratoom, K. (2021). Fostering individual-level absorptive capacity and adaptive performance through leadership context. Baltic Journal of Management.
  • Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01
  • Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211.
  • Shahidan, A. N., Azizan, F. L., Arifin, M. A., Abumandil, M. S. S., & Arshad, M. Z. (2021). Person-Environment Fit and Adaptive Performance among Nurses in Malaysian Public Hospitals. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(8), 593–604.
  • Shoaib, M., Nawal, A., Korsakien?, R., Záme?ník, R., Rehman, A. U., & Raišien?, A. G. (2022). Performance of academic staff during COVID-19 pandemic-induced work transformations: An IPO model for stress management. Economies, 10(2), 51.
  • Solberg, E. (2017). Adapting to Changing Job Demands: A Broadcast Approach to Understanding Self-Regulated Adaptive Performance and Cultivating It in Situated Work Settings.
  • Stokes, C. K., Schneider, T. R., & Lyons, J. B. (2010). Adaptive performance: a criterion problem. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 16(3/4), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011053278
  • UNESCO. (2021). 2020 Global Education Meeting, an extraordinary session on education post-COVID-19, 20-22 October 2020: final report.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Iskandar, A. I., Romaiha, N. R., & Jahya, A. (2024). Construct Validity of Adaptive Performance: A Case of Malaysian Lecturers. Information Management and Business Review, 16(4(S)I), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i4(S)I.4292

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2024-11-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission