Author

  • Nurul Shafika Zul Razali

    • Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, UiTM Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Selvakkumar K N Vaiappuri

    • Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, UiTM Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Noor Zubaidah Abdul Rahman

    • Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, UiTM Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Aroop Mukherjee

    • College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, KSA
    • Saudi Arabia

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of crowdfunding adoption among young agribusiness entrepreneurs in Malaysia, particularly those aged 18 to 40. As an alternative to conventional financing options, crowdfunding offers an accessible funding mechanism for entrepreneurs who face challenges securing traditional loans due to limited collateral, high risk, and stringent banking requirements. The study identifies and examines five key factors influencing crowdfunding participation: trust issues, limited financial resources, entrepreneurial attitudes, banking constraints, and awareness of crowdfunding. Data were collected through a survey of 117 young agribusiness entrepreneurs and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Pearson correlation analysis. Results indicate that while crowdfunding awareness positively correlates with the desire to participate, significant barriers persist in terms of trust and financial limitations. These findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge on alternative financing in Malaysia's agricultural sector, providing actionable insights for policymakers and practitioners. The study concludes that targeted interventions are necessary to build trust, improve financial literacy, and promote crowdfunding as a viable tool for economic development within the agribusiness sector.

Keywords

References

  • Aderemi, A. M. R., Maulida, S., & Maikabara, A. A. (2021). Prospects and challenges of crowdfunding as an alternative funding option in Nigeria. Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 12(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v12i1.17-31
  • Adonia, S., Ahmad, K., & Zabri, S. (2018). An exploration of financing preferences among entrepreneurs: The case of micro-enterprises in Kelantan, Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 15(1), 769.
  • Arumugam, N., Manap, M., Parimala, T., & Thevarajoo, D. (2020). Netizens’ perceptions towards crowdfunding scams. International Journal of Academic Research in Public Policy and Governance, 7(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.46886/IJARPPG/v7-i1/729
  • Azganin, H., Kassim, S., & Saad, A. A. (2021). Islamic P2P crowdfunding (IP2PC) platform for the development of the paddy industry in Malaysia: An operational perspective. Journal of Islamic Finance, 10(1), 65–75. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiibf-journal/index.php/jif/article/view/563
  • Babich, V., Marinesi, S., & Tsoukalas, G. (2021). Does crowdfunding benefit entrepreneurs and venture capital investors? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 508-524.
  • Bernardino, S., & Santos, J. F. (2020). Crowdfunding: An exploratory study on knowledge, benefits, and barriers perceived by young potential entrepreneurs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 81.
  • Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Rowe, A. (2019). Start-ups, entrepreneurial networks and equity crowdfunding: A processual perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.003
  • Eaton, P., Frank, B., Johnson, K., & Willoughby, S. (2019). Comparing exploratory factor models of the brief electricity and magnetism assessment and the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.020133
  • Eniola, A. A. (2021). The entrepreneur's motivation and financing sources. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 25.
  • Kakade, S., Salunkhe, M., Jagadale, V., & Bhosale, T. (2018). Principal components analysis: A method useful in the identification of clusters of variables. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 3(5). https://ijisrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Principal-Components-Analysis-a-method-Useful-in-Identification-of-Clusters-of-Variables.pdf
  • Lam, W. R., & Liu, Y. (2020). Tackling small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) financing in China. Annals of Economics & Finance, 21(1).
  • Mokhtarrudin, A., Masrurah, I. M. K., & Muhamad, S. C. R. (2017, June 7). Pertanika Journal. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjtas/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-S0300-2016
  • Nordin, N., & Sum, R. M. (2020). Crowdfunding: The two-sided financing alternative. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 7(1), 1-9.
  • Radzi, R. M., & Yaacob, Z. (2022). Identifying business potential for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) based on developmental plans in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 9(2), 34-50.
  • Razak, D. A., Zulmi, S. R., & Dawami, Q. (2021). Customers’ perception of Islamic crowdfunding as a possible financial solution for the pandemic Covid-19 crisis in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Finance, 10, 92-100. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiibf-journal/index.php/jif/article/view/531
  • Salikin, N., Wahab, N. A., & Muhammad, I. (2014). Strengths and weaknesses among Malaysian SMEs: Financial management perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.685
  • Salim, M., & Kassim, S. (2019). Awareness towards crowdfunding as an alternative financing mechanism among youth entrepreneurs. Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018), 292. https://doi.org/10.2991/agc-18.2019.57
  • Securities Commission Malaysia. (2016, April 13). SC introduces a regulatory framework to facilitate peer-to-peer financing. Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/sc-introduces-regulatory-framework-to-facilitate-peer-to-peer-financing
  • Securities Commission Malaysia. (2023, October 13). Securities Commission Malaysia’s comments on Budget 2024. Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/securities-commission-malaysias-comments-on-budget-2024
  • Shabbab, N., Bin, S., Tamrin, M., Guan, N., & How, V. (2020). Review of knowledge, attitude, and practice among laboratory workers towards occupational safety and health. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 16(1), 2636–9346. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint /76938/1/2020011612271544_MJMHS_0325.pdf
  • Shi Qing, C., Yi, C., Chew, Y., Lew, H., & Liang, J. (2019). An insight into Malaysian crowdfunding success. http://eprints.utar.edu.my/3563/1/fyp_BF_2019_LJL.pdf
  • Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296.
  • Tambi, M. F., Hanif, A., & Rosnan, H. (2022, May). Understanding the potentials and challenges of agricultural technology-based crowdfunding in Malaysia. ResearchGate. http://dx.doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v19i1.17247
  • The Edge Malaysia. (2024, September 23). Financing Biz: An SME financing recovery for 2021? The Edge Malaysia. https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/financing-biz-sme-financing-recovery-2021
  • Torres, B., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Oliveira, M. (2024). Crowdfunding versus traditional banking: Alternative or complementary systems for financing projects in Portugal? International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(2), 33.
  • Yu, A. V., & Yu, P. O. (2022). Alternative sources of capital attraction: Crowdfunding and crowd-investing startups. ????? ? ????????: ???????????? ????????????, 16(1), 206-218

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Zul Razali, N. S., Vaiappuri, S. K. N., Abdul Rahman, N. Z., & Mukherjee, A. (2024). Empowering Agribusiness: Crowdfunding as a Catalyst for Young Agri-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 16(4(S)I), 340-351. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i4(S)I.4268

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nurul Shafika Zul Razali, Selvakkumar K N Vaiappuri, Noor Zubaidah Abdul Rahman, Aroop Mukherjee (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 16 No. 4(S)I (2024) Digital Payments, Game-Based Learning & Knowledge Behaviour View issue contents

Published

2024-11-27

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission