Author

  • Ummi Habibah Mohd Shakil

    • School of Languages, Literacies & Translation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Nurul Syifaa Mohd Shakil

    • Department of Economics and Financial Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This research study focuses on the effectiveness of using Google Docs in enhancing the writing of argumentative essays among engineering students. The aim is to investigate how the integration of Google Docs as a digital writing tool impacts the development of argumentative writing skills. The study also explores the relationship between the usage of Google Docs and the improvement of key components in argumentative essay writing, including claims, counter-claims, reasons, and evidence. The research adopts a quantitative approach, incorporating pre-tests, post-test 1, and post-test 2 to assess students' writing performance before and after utilising Google Docs. A questionnaire is employed to strengthen the proof of students' understanding and experiences regarding the usage of Google Docs in their writing process. The results will contribute to the existing literature on technology-enhanced writing instruction, particularly in the field of engineering education. The study's implications may inform educators, curriculum designers, and policy-makers in designing effective strategies to enhance students' writing skills and foster their engagement in the writing process.

Keywords

References

  • Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2014). The Long and Winding Road: Investigating the Differential Writing Patterns of High and Low Skilled Writers. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 304–307. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276920371
  • Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The Narrative Waltz: The Role of Flexibility in Writing Proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(7), 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000109
  • Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Writing Flexibility in Argumentative Essays: A Multidimensional Analysis. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1607–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9921-y
  • Alwahoub, H. M., Jomaa, N. J., & Azmi, M. N. L. (2022). The Impact of Synchronous Collaborative Writing and Google Docs Collaborative Features on Enhancing Students’ Individual Writing Performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46541
  • Ambrose, R. M., & Palpanathan, S. (2018). Investigating the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) Using Google Documents in Enhancing Writing – A study on Senior 1 Students in a Chinese Independent High School. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.04
  • Anderson, J. (2021). Enhancing Document Management and Accessibility: The Role of Start and Index Features in Google Docs. Journal of Information Systems, 46(3), 201-218.
  • Aydin, ?. (2019). The Effect of Google Docs on Writing Skills in EFL Classes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 92-107.
  • Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the quality of students’ academic writing: an intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476092
  • Botley, S. P. (2014). Argument Structure in Learner Writing: A Corpus-Based Analysis Using Argument Mapping. Kajian Malaysia, 32(1), 45–77.
  • Braasch, J. L., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003
  • Caratozzolo, P., Alvarez-Delgado, A., & Hosseini, S. (2019). Strengthening Critical Thinking in Engineering Students. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (Ijidem), 13(3), 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00559-6
  • Crowhurst, M. (1990). Teaching and Learning the Writing of Persuasive/Argumentative Discourse. Canadian Journal of Education, 15(4), 348. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495109
  • Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413-434.
  • De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. K. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.001
  • D. Parico, A., & P. Layco, E. (2020). A Descriptive Analysis of the Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(8). https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_8/14805_Parico_2020_E1_R.pdf
  • European Commission. (2013). Survey of Schools: ICT in Education Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools. https://ec.europa.eu/
  • Fan, C., & Chen, G. (2021). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
  • Ferretti, R., & Fan, Y. (2016). Argumentative writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 301–315). NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Fidalgo-Redondo, R., & García-Pastor, M. D. (2020). Interactive Writing Tools for Improving Paragraph Coherence in Argumentative Texts. Computers & Education, 154, 103922. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103922
  • Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who’s Citing Whose Writings? A Corpus Based Study of Citations as Interpersonal Resource in English Medium National and English Medium International Journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 102-115.
  • Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955
  • Kim, J. E., & Nam, H. (2019). How Do Textual Features of L2 Argumentative Essays Differ Across Proficiency Levels? A Multidimensional Cross-Sectional Study. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2251-2279.
  • Koch, M. (2010). Utilizing emergent web-based software tools as an effective method for increasing collaboration and knowledge sharing in collocated student design teams (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Oregon.
  • Kostoulas, A. (2019). Repositioning language education theory. In A. Kostoulas (ed.), Challenging boundaries in language education (pp. 33-50). Cham: Springer.
  • Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.
  • Leiva, M. L., & Verma, S. (2020). The Use of Google Docs for Online Collaborative Writing. Journal of Open Education Resources, 4(1), 19-35.
  • Liu, Y., & Zhan, W. (2018). The Impact of Indexicality on the Use of Start Markers in Electronic Writing: An Experimental Study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.003
  • Mitchell, S., & Riddle, M. (2004). Developing A Toolkit for Tackling Academic Discourse. Learning to Read Critically in Language and Literacy, 65-85.
  • Namaziandost, E., Rahimi, S., & Rezai, A. (2022). Developmental Potential of Self-Assessment Reports for High School Students’ Writing Skills: A Qualitative Study. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (TESLQ), 2(41), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.22099/TESL.2022.42670.3082
  • Nasrollahi, V. R. (2024)Voices Across Borders: Iranian EFL Students’ Perspective on Argumentative Writing. US-China Foreign Language, 21(9), 353-365.
  • Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in Disciplinary Culture: University Tutors' Views on Assessed Writing Tasks. British studies in applied linguistics, 21, 99.
  • Nguyen, P. H. M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2025). Learner Engagement With Feedback in Essay Writing: A Multiple Case Study. In Differentiated Instruction, Equity, and Inclusion in Language Education (pp. 273-302). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  • Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, And Learning: Preface and Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359.
  • Sari, F. M., & Oktaviani, L. (2021). Undergraduate Students' Views on The Use of Online Learning Platform During COVID-19 Pandemic. Teknosastik, 19(1), 41-47.
  • Von Holzen, K., & Müller Werder, C. (2018). Annotation Functions for Text-Based Academic Writing: A Comparison of Digital Reading Tools. Journal of Writing Research, 10(3), 407-434. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2018.10.03.03
  • Wang, X. (2018). The Role of Counterargument in Persuasion: Effects of Counterargument Refutation, Source Credibility, and Claim Relevance on Attitude Change. Journal of Business Communication, 55(3), 310-331. doi: 10.1177/0021943617747524

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mohd Shakil, U. H., & Mohd Shakil, N. S. (2025). The Effectiveness of Writing an Argumentative Essay Using Google Docs Among Engineering Students. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4696

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ummi Habibah Mohd Shakil, Nurul Syifaa Mohd Shakil (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 17 No. 3(I) (2025) Tourism, Heritage & Employee Retention View issue contents

Published

2025-09-13

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission