Author

  • Emi Normalina Omar

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Siti Noorsuriani Maon

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Research Group: Sustaining Quality of Life, EK Social Creativity & Innovation, Research Nexus UiTM (ReNeU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Noor’ain Mohamad Yunus

    • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Research Group: Sustaining Quality of Life, EK Social Creativity & Innovation, Research Nexus UiTM (ReNeU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Sharmila Mohd Salleh

    • Yayasan Inovasi Malaysia, Enterprise 4, Taman Teknologi Malaysia, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This research investigates a contemporary strategy for revitalizing Malaysia’s batik industry by introducing the Batik Pointillism Block, a modern substitute for the traditional copper batik blocks. Utilizing a focused qualitative case study alongside SWOT analysis, the study closely examines the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to this product innovation. The Batik Pointillism Block, manufactured with CNC technology and heat-resistant acrylic, directly addresses persistent challenges in the sector, including high production costs, limited skilled labor, and waning interest from younger generations. Findings indicate that this new approach can enhance productivity, reduce operational expenses, and expand design versatility, thereby making batik production more accessible, particularly for B40 communities and emerging young artisans. Nonetheless, limitations persist regarding distribution, market reach, and users’ technical proficiency, which currently hinder broader adoption. The study further underscores the potential of social innovation and community-driven training initiatives in supporting both cultural preservation and economic development. From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest a clear need for structured training programs, diversified marketing strategies, sustained investment in research and development, and the formation of strategic partnerships to facilitate commercialization and scalability. Ultimately, the Batik Pointillism Block represents a sustainable and inclusive pathway for modernizing Malaysia’s batik industry while safeguarding its cultural heritage.

Keywords

References

  • Adhanita, S. (2013). Pengembangan batik Jambi motif Sungai Penuh sebagai bentuk kontribusi pada pembangunan. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 9(4), 381–392.
  • Adikuncoro, A. R. (2021). Merdeka Cultural Center final architecture design studio: Adaptable cultural center for cultural development with open building and adaptive reuse approach (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan).
  • Aksoy, L., Alkire, L., Choi, S., Kim, P. B., & Zhang, L. (2019). Social innovation in service: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 30(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0366
  • Asmah, A. E., Okpattah, V., & Frimpong, C. (2018). A combined material substitution and process change approach to sustainable batik production. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 365(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/1/012029
  • Barr, M. S. (2018). Innovation & regulation: Some preliminary observations. In R. Lastra & H. H. Lee (Eds.), Achieving financial stability: Challenges to prudential regulation (pp. 239–248). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813238550_0014
  • Bradley, S. W., Kim, P. H., Klein, P. G., McMullen, J. S., & Wennberg, K. (2021). Policy for innovative entrepreneurship: Institutions, interventions, and societal challenges. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1390
  • Glogar, M., Petrak, S., & Mahni? Nagli?, M. (2025). Digital technologies in the sustainable design and development of textiles and clothing—A literature review. Sustainability, 17(4), 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041371
  • Gupta, S., Kumar, V., & Karam, E. (2020). New-age technologies-driven social innovation: What, how, where, and why? Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.026
  • Handayani, K. N., Sakai, T., Deguchi, A., & Prasanna, D. (2012). Changes and issues of development and management of batik industry in Java: A case study of Surakarta and Yogyakarta. Journal of Architecture and Urban Design, 22, 1–10.
  • Hardjati, S., Prathama, A., & Wahyudi, K. E. (2020). Mapping the internal and external environments in empowering Semanggi batik craftsmen in Surabaya. JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik), 8(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v8i1.367
  • Hartomo, S., & Bakal, T. (2021). Analysis of usability and user experience on batik’s website design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1115(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1115/1/012027
  • Martuti, N. K. T., Hidayah, I., Margunani, M., & Alafima, R. B. (2020). Organic material for clean production in the batik industry: A case study of natural batik, Semarang, Indonesia. Recycling, 5(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling5040028
  • Narayanan, H., & Yew-Wah, L. (2018). Innovation policy in Malaysia. In M. Kean & R. Sanderson (Eds.), Innovation policy in ASEAN (pp. 128–162). Routledge.
  • Nugroho, P., Damayanti, M., Artiningsih, A., Lestari, D., & Putri, N. R. (2022). Missing policy for supporting cultural heritage preservation of batik industry clusters in Barlingmascakeb Region, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1097(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1097/1/012046
  • Nurcahyanti, D., Kristiandi, K., Sari, A. D., Nurkasanah, A. A., Rochimah, E. A., Prayitno, F. A. H., & Grahan, T. K. (2025). Pelatihan pembuatan batik kombinasi cap dan kuas untuk pengembangan produk home decor pada Paguyuban Batik Giriarum. Mestaka: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.55312/mestaka.v4i1.215
  • Poon, S. (2020). Symbolic resistance: Tradition in batik transitions sustains beauty, cultural heritage, and status in the era of modernity. World Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjss.v7n2p10
  • Rahayu, I. A. T., & Peng, L. H. (2020). Sustainable batik production: Review and research framework. In International Conference on Research and Academic Community Services (ICRACOS 2019) (pp. 113–118). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.052
  • Razali, H., Ibrahim, M., Omar, M., & Hashim, S. (2021). Current challenges of the batik industry in Malaysia and proposed solutions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2347, 020225. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051635
  • Sebayang, L. K. B., Utami, S., & Suseno, D. A. (2019). Will natural-dying batik SMEs compete in the Asian Economic Community? The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.52.343.347
  • Setyaningrum, F., & Nuraini, F. (2020). Visual perception of elementary school teacher education students on “Batik Cap” aesthetic. In International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019) (pp. 353–358). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.137
  • Shofari, F., Kurniawati, D., & Paramawardhani, H. (2022). Green productivity approach in batik industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1097(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1097/1/012041
  • Sulaiman, A. I., Sugito, T., Prastyanti, S., Windiasih, R., & Prasetiyo, P. (2022). Student community services in batik education for the young generation. International Journal of Community Service, 2(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.55522/ijocs.v2i3.148
  • Weerasinghe, N., Weerasinghe, A., Perera, Y., Tennakoon, S., Rathnayake, N., & Jayasinghe, P. (2023). Sustainability practices and organizational performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and economic crisis: A case of the apparel and textile industry in Sri Lanka. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0288179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288179
  • Wesnina, W., Prabawati, M., & Noerharyono, M. (2025). Integrating traditional and contemporary in digital techniques: The analysis of Indonesian batik motifs' evolution. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2474845. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2474845
  • Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2–19.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed., Vol. 5). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Omar, E. N., Maon, S. N., Mohamad Yunus, N., & Mohd Salleh, S. (2025). Redefines Traditional Techniques in Batik Industry: A SWOT Analysis Approach. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4647

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2025-09-13

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission