Author

  • Khairolina Kamat

    • Pengurusan Air Pahang Berhad Pengurusan Air Pahang Berhad, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Maliza Delima Kamarul Zaman

    • Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Dayang Nailul Munna Abg Abdullah

    • Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

The research on task performance (TP) has grown linearly throughout the years. However, there is still a lack of complete understanding of the quantitative method to identify the perceived management support (PMS) for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), perceived customer support (PCS) for CSR, output control (OC), autonomous motivation (AM) and controlled motivation (CM) on task performance (TP), especially in Pengurusan Air Pahang Berhad (PAIP) context. Investigating the relationship between the perceived management support (PMS) for CSR, perceived customer support (PCS) for CSR, output control (OC), autonomous motivation (AM), controlled motivation (CM), and task performance (TP) is the primary purpose of this study to be conducted. According to the PAIP, in an interview session, the performance review session is held twice throughout the year: Mid-Year Performance Review and Final-Year Performance Review. However, the management noticed that the performance of the employees was not really well for the meter readers in PAIP.

Keywords

References

  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Bapat, S., & Upadhyay, P. (2017). A Study of Employee Participation in CSR and Its Impact on Employee Engagement. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(6), 1–6.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
  • Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013
  • Flamholtz, E. G. (1996). Effective Organizational Control: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Hanaysha, J., & Tahir, P. R. (2016). Examining the Effects of Employee Empowerment, Teamwork, and Employee Training on Job Satisfaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.016
  • Johnson, K. R., Park, S., & Bartlett, K. R. (2018). Perceptions of customer service orientation, training, and employee engagement in Jamaica’s hospitality sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(3/4), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2017-0094
  • Kousar, J. B., & Azeez, A. (2015). The Importance of Statistical Tools in Research Work. International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research (IJSIMR0, 3(12), 50–58.
  • Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  • Narehan, H., Hairunnisa, M., Norfadzillah, R. A., & Freziamella, L. (2014). The Effect of Quality of Work Life (QWL) Programs on Quality of Life (QOL) among Employees at Multinational Companies in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1136
  • Pattnaik, S. C., & Sahoo, R. (2021). Employee engagement, creativity, and task performance: role of perceived workplace autonomy. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 10(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-11-2019-0196
  • Rozali, M. Z., Puteh, S., Nur Yunus, F. A., Hamdan, N. H., & Mohd Latif, F. (2022). Reliability and Validity of Instrument on Academic Enhancement Support for Student-Athletes Using the Rasch Measurement Model. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i1.17199
  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Truss, C., & Soane, E. (2013). The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship, and deviant behaviours. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2608–2627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.744334
  • Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: the mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/256375
  • Tsourvakas, G., & Yfantidou, I. (2018). Corporate social responsibility influences employee engagement. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2016-0153

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Kamat, K., Kamarul Zaman, M. D., & Abg Abdullah, D. N. M. (2025). Corporate Social Responsibility, Output Control and Motivation on Task Performance of the Meter Readers in PAIP Berhad. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4654

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2025-09-13

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission