Author

  • Noor Aishah Mohd Ali

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Money Laundering Research Group, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Siti Hawa Shuid

    • Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Negeri Sembilan Kampus Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
    • Money Laundering Research Group, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

Globalization and technology advancements have created new opportunities exploited by income taxpayers to evade tax, thereby undermining the credibility of tax authorities worldwide. This systematic review investigates the enforcement efforts used by tax authorities in combating and curbing tax evasion. Relevant articles were selected using two main databases: Scopus and Web of Science. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, 45 relevant articles published between 2018 and 2025 were identified. Through thematic analysis, eight main themes have been developed for the enforcement strategies employed by tax authorities across jurisdictions. The findings indicate that the tax audit is the most used strategy employed to curb tax evasion among income taxpayers, followed by deterrence messages, fines and penalties. Moreover, the tax audit is the most effective enforcement effort that shows its effectiveness as a strong deterrent against tax evasion. A key information gap was identified where only 11 studies out of 45 studies carried out comparative evaluations on different enforcement efforts, highlighting the need for more cross-contextual research in the future. This study provides valuable insights for researchers by highlighting underexplored enforcement strategies and for tax authorities in enhancing and refining their enforcement approaches to effectively address tax evasion.

Keywords

References

  • Ahrens, L., & Bothner, F. (2020). The Big Bang: Tax evasion after automatic exchange of information under FATCA and CRS. New Political Economy, 25(6), 849 – 864. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1639651
  • Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
  • Alm, J. (2021). Tax evasion, technology, and inequality. Economics of Governance, 22(4), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-021-00247-w
  • Alstadsaeter, A., Godar, S., Nicolaides, P., & Zucman, G. (2024). Global tax evasion report 2024. https://www.taxobservatory.eu/about
  • Alstadsaeter, A., & Jacob, M. (2018). Tax incentives and noncompliance: Evidence from Swedish Micro Data. Public Finance Review, 46(4), 609–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116673900
  • Alstadsaeter, A., Johannesen, N., & Herry Segal Le Guern and Zucman, G. (2022). Tax evasion and tax avoidance. Journal of Public Economics, 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104587
  • Appelgren, L. (2020). A survey of models for determining optimal audit strategies. Advances in Accounting, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2020.100455
  • Bagchi, S., & Dusek, L. (2021). The effects of introducing withholding and third-party reporting on tax collections: Evidence from the US state personal income tax. Journal of Public Economics, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104537
  • Bayer, R. C. (2022). The double dividend of relative auditing—Theory and experiments on corporate tax enforcement. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 24(6), 1433–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12587
  • Bazart, C., Beaud, M., & Dubois, D. (2020). Whistleblowing vs. random audit: An experimental test of relative efficiency. Kyklos, 73(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12215
  • Beer, S., & de Mooij, R. (2024). Coming clean on your taxes. Economic Analysis and Policy, 84, 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.032
  • Berger, W., Hokamp, S., & Seibold, G. (2021). Dynamic behavioural changes in an agent-based econophysics tax compliance model: Bomb crater versus target effects and efficient audit strategies. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 36(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1332/251569120X15840237292628
  • Bjørneby, M., Alstadsæter, A., & Telle, K. (2021). Limits to third-party reporting: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in Norway. Journal of Public Economics, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104512
  • Bott, K. M., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E. O., & Tungodden, B. (2020). You’ve got mail: A randomized field experiment on tax evasion. Management Science, 66(7), 2801–2819. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3390
  • Carfora, A., Pansini, R. V., & Pisani, S. (2018). Regional tax evasion and audit enforcement. Regional Studies, 52(3), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1299934
  • Carrillo, P., Donaldson, D., Pomeranz, D., & Singhal, M. (2023). Ghosting the tax authority: Fake firms and tax fraud in Ecuador. American Economic Review-Insights, 5(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20220321
  • Castro, J. F., Velasquez, D., Beltran, A., & Yamada, G. (2022). The direct and indirect effects of messages on tax compliance: Experimental evidence from Peru? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 203, 483–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.09.022
  • Chan, H. F., Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., Moy, N., & Torgler, B. (2023). Cash and the hidden economy: Experimental evidence on fighting tax evasion in small business transactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05186-y
  • Chong, K.-R., Yusri, Y., Selamat, A. I., & Ong, T. S. (2019). Tax climate manipulation on individual tax behavioural intentions. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(3), 230 – 242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2019-0001
  • Clemente, F., Lírio, V. S., & Aransiola, T. J. (2021). Brazilian evidence on tax evasion and enforcement: A case study of Global North–South comparison. Criminal Justice Review, 46(4), 450 – 465. https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168211038040
  • D’Agosto, E., Manzo, M., Pisani, S., & D’Arcangelo, F. M. (2018). The effect of audit activity on tax declaration: Evidence on small businesses in Italy. Public Finance Review, 46(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117698035
  • Dare, C. (2020). The impact of changes in audits and penalties on tax compliance behaviour: evidence from South Africa. Southern African Business Review, 24. https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/4824
  • Debacker, J., Heim, B. T., Tran, A., & Yuskavage, A. (2018). The effects of IRS audits on EITC claimants. National Tax Journal, 71(3), 451–484. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2018.3.02
  • Doran, M. (2009). Tax penalties and tax compliance. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 46(1), 111–161.
  • Dularif, M., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2022). Tax compliance and non-deterrence approach: a systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(11–12), 1080–1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2021-0108
  • Filippin, A., Fiorio, C. V., & Viviano, E. (2013). The effect of tax enforcement on tax morale. European Journal of Political Economy, 32, 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.005
  • Garz, M., & Pagels, V. (2018). Cautionary tales: Celebrities, the news media, and participation in tax amnesties. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 155, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.001
  • Gould, M., & Rablen, M. D. (2020). Voluntary disclosure schemes for offshore tax evasion. International Tax and Public Finance, 27(4), 805–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-019-09586-1
  • Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
  • Harju, J., Kotakorpi, K., Matikka, T., & Nivala, A. (2025). Tax enforcement and firm performance: real and reporting responses to risk-based tax audits. International Tax and Public Finance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09895-8
  • Holz, J. E., List, J. A., Zentner, A., Cardoza, M., & Zentner, J. E. (2023). The $100 million nudge: Increasing tax compliance of firms using a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104779
  • Irawan, F., & Utama, A. S. (2021). The impact of tax audit and corruption perception on tax evasion. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4290.2021
  • Jin, P., Li, G., & Xiong, W. (2022). Deterrence or conformity?-An analysis of digital economy taxpayer compliance behavior based on prospect theory. Frontiers In Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967715
  • Kasper, M., & Rablen, M. D. (2023). Tax compliance after an audit: Higher or lower? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 207, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.01.013
  • Koch, C., & Müller, C. (2024). Tax amnesties and the insurance effect: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102130
  • Kogler, C., Olsen, J., Müller, M., & Kirchler, E. (2022). Information processing in tax decisions: a MouselabWEB study on the deterrence model of income tax evasion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2272
  • Kumi, R., & Kwasi Bannor, R. (2023). Job performance, knowledge and perceived power of tax officers on tax morale amongst agrochemical traders in Ghana. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41(3), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-09-2022-0163
  • López-Laborda, J., Vallés-Giménez, J., & Zarate-Marco, A. (2023). Fighting vacation rental tax evasion through warnings to potential evaders. Real Estate Economics, 51(6), 1437–1466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12425
  • Meiselman, B. S. (2018). Ghostbusting in Detroit: Evidence on nonfilers from a controlled field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 158, 180 – 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.005
  • Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
  • Mogollon, M., Ortega, D., & Scartascini, C. (2021). Who’s calling? The effect of phone calls and personal interaction on tax compliance. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(6), 1302–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09655-4
  • Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 258). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120595
  • Okafor, O. N. (2023). Shaming of tax evaders: Empirical evidence on perceptions of retributive justice and tax compliance intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(2), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05011-y
  • Organ, P. R., Ruda, A., Slemrod, J., & Turk, A. (2022). Incentive effects of the IRS’s passport certification and revocation process. Journal of Public Economics, 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104625
  • Ortega, D., & Scartascini, C. (2020). Don’t blame the messenger. The delivery method of a message matters. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 170, 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.008
  • Pavel, R., Acikgoz, B., Poudou, J.-C., & Willinger, M. (2025). Statute of limitations for tax evasion. KYKLOS, 78(2), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12440
  • Ramírez-Álvarez, J. (2023). The accountant as a means to corporate tax compliance: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 58(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2022.90
  • Rashid, M. H. U. (2020). Taxpayers’ attitude towards tax evasion in a developing country: Do the demographic characteristics matter? International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 9(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABE.2020040101
  • Robbins, B., & Kiser, E. (2020). State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion. Social Science Research, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102448
  • Romaniuc, R., Dubois, D., Dimant, E., Lupusor, A., & Prohnitchi, V. (2022). Understanding cross-cultural differences in peer reporting practices: evidence from tax evasion games in Moldova and France. Public Choice, 190(1–2), 127 – 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00925-7
  • Russo, F. F. (2018). Reporting tax evasion. Economia Politica, 35(3), 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0096-4
  • Sánchez, G. E. (2022). Non-compliance notifications and taxpayer strategic behavior: evidence from Ecuador. International Tax and Public Finance, 29(3), 627–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09677-y
  • Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.1.25
  • Swanepoel, A. P., & Meiring, J. (2018). Adequacy of law enforcement and prosecution of economic crimes in South Africa. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2016-0081
  • Tax Justice Network. (2024). https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/State-of-Tax-Justice-2024-English-Tax-Justice-Network.pdf
  • Waseem, M. (2018). Taxes, informality and income shifting: Evidence from a recent Pakistani tax reform. Journal of Public Economics, 157(C), 41–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.11.003
  • Waseem, M. (2020). Does cutting the tax rate to zero induce behavior different from other tax cuts? Evidence from Pakistan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00832
  • Zamiruddin, R. `Aqeela, Bujang, I., Othman, R. D., & Girau, E. A. (2024). Mediating effects of trust and fairness on commitment and tax compliance behaviour in the Special Voluntary Disclosure Program. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 19(3), 117–163.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mohd Ali, N. A., & Shuid, S. H. (2025). Enforcement Efforts in Fighting Tax Evasion: A Systematic Literature Review Approach. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I), 462-474. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4672

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Noor Aishah Mohd Ali, Siti Hawa Shuid (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 17 No. 3(I) (2025) Tourism, Heritage & Employee Retention View issue contents

Published

2025-09-13

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission