Author

  • Shamsul Azren Mohd Shukor

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Natasha Dzulkalnine

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Nur Aizureen Anwar

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Zarina Abdul Munir

    • Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

  • Mohammad Johari Abdul Rahman

    • Tenaga Nasional Berhad, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between student engagement and the availability and quality of campus facilities at a Malaysian university, particularly emphasizing the varying experiences of resident and non-resident students. The issue being addressed is the uneven degree of participation from students, especially those who do not live on campus, which could be impacted by their opinions and use of the facilities. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of facility availability and quality on student involvement and the effect of the involvement of non-resident students. A quantitative research design was used, and student survey data were analyzed using multiple regression and cross-tab analysis involving 271 respondents. The results show that while the quality of campus facilities positively and significantly impacts student engagement, there is a negative and significant relationship between facility availability and student engagement. Additionally, cross-tab results show that resident students are more engaged and satisfied than non-resident students. These findings imply that facilities' relevance, quality, and accessibility are more important than quantity. In order to create a more welcoming and balanced campus environment, the study suggests that university planners prioritize raising facility standards and creating inclusive strategies to involve all student groups, particularly non-residents.

Keywords

References

  • Adams, T. B., Bezner, J. R., Drabbs, M. E., Zambarano, R. J., & Steinhardt, M. A. (2000). Conceptualization and Measurement of the Spiritual and Psychological Dimensions of Wellness in a College Population. Journal of American College Health, 4(4), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009595692
  • Ahmad, N. S., Ismail, A., & Husain, Z. (2022). Psychological well-being impacts among university students on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Public Health Science, 11(3), 1037-1045.
  • Amir, N., Sukimin, I. S., Radzi, S. F. M., Zolkapli, R. B. M., Soopar, A. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A study of the relationship between instrumentality, expectancy and value for learning motivation among undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), 1215-1233.
  • Astin, A. W. (1999). How the liberal arts college affects students. Daedalus, 128(1), 77-100.
  • Chaudhry, S., Tandon, A., Shinde, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2024). Student psychological well-being in higher education: The role of internal team environment, institutional, friends and family support, and academic engagement. PLOS ONE, 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297508
  • Chen, L., & Wong, H. (2023). Campus Facilities Quality and Its Influence on Student Well-being. Higher Education Management Review, 28(1), 150-167.
  • Fisher, M., Abate, T., Lunduka, R. W., Asnake, W., Alemayehu, Y., & Madulu, R. B. (2015). Drought-tolerant maize for farmer adaptation to drought in sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of adoption in eastern and southern Africa. Climatic Change, 133(2), 283-299.
  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
  • Lim, J., & Tan, R. (2021). Evaluating University Facilities: Their Role in Enhancing Student Comfort and Engagement. Journal of Campus Life, 23(3), 210-225.
  • Norton, T. (2023). The Influence of Campus Facilities on the Satisfaction and Retention of Students in a Higher Education Setting.
  • Rahman, M. A., Das, P., Lam, L., Alif, S. M., Sultana, F., Salehin, M., ... & Polman, R. (2024). Health and well-being of staff working at higher education institutions globally during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period: evidence from a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1848.
  • Swai, C. Z., Nkaizirwa, J. P., Hugo, A. K., Mahenge, C. A., & Komba, P. S. (2022). Strengthening teacher education in Tanzania: Student-teachers’ and tutors’ satisfaction with college facilities and environment. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2070053.
  • Tan, T. H., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Residential environment, third places and well-being in Malaysian older adults. Social Indicators Research, 162(2), 721-738.
  • Temple, E. (2013). Associations between psychosocial well-being and the development of beneficial time perspectives. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Psychologica, 6(1), 72-87.
  • Teo, S. C., Lilian, A., & Koo, A. C. (2023). Examining the effects of academic motivation and online learning on Malaysian tertiary students’ psychological well-being and perceived learning performance. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2186025.
  • Zhang, M., Ng, L., & Lee, J. (2023). The Relationship Between Facilities Quality and Student Well-being in Universities. International Journal of Educational Environment, 22(4), 345–362.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Mohd Shukor, S. A., Dzulkalnine, N., Anwar, N. A., Abdul Munir, Z., & Abdul Rahman, M. J. (2025). Assessing Students’ Well-being by Campus Facilities. Information Management and Business Review, 17(3(I), 668-678. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4713

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Shamsul Azren Mohd Shukor, Natasha Dzulkalnine, Nur Aizureen Anwar, Zarina Abdul Munir, Mohammad Johari Abdul Rahman (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 17 No. 3(I) (2025) Tourism, Heritage & Employee Retention View issue contents

Published

2025-09-13

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission