Author

  • Mahdieh Sabaghpour Azarian

    • International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Yunura Azura Yunus

    • International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
  • Abdul Rahman Ahmad Dahlan

    • International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Malaysia

Abstract

As knowledge is being accepted as an inseparable imperative strategy of organization, organizations look at knowledge as a power, which drives advantages to them. However, many organizations believe it is not about just the existence of knowledge but the organizational growth is being driven from the act of knowledge sharing. As modern economy, takes knowledge as a point to achieve project success, this competitive advantage is being utilized from the greater degree of inter-organizational utilization of information and data coupled with the harnessing of people’s skills and ideas as well as their commitments and motivations. Therefore, it is undeniable that today's knowledge is an essential asset of every single company and it has become more important than land, labor or capital in today’s economy. This paper investigates on the importance of knowledge management in generating of project success by analyzing whether or not government companies and agencies in Malaysia practice Knowledge Management. In this regard, a research has been conducted amongst fifteen Malaysian governmental companies and agencies to find how effective project managers in Malaysian government companies, integrate Knowledge Management criteria and key success elements in order to achieve project success and gain success.

Keywords

References

  • Alkhaldi, F. M. K. (2003). An Integration of Information Technology, Culture of Knowledge Transfer and Innovative Work Environment In Support Of Organizational Knowledge Creation Activities. Published by University of Huddersfield 2003.
  • Artto, K. & Dietrich, P., (2004). Strategic Business Management Through Multiple Projects. In: Morris, P.W.G., Pinto, J.K. (Eds.), the Wiley Guide to Managing Projects. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1–33.
  • Asish, O., Mathew, L. L., Rodrigues, R. & Alapati, V. (2012).Human Factors & Knowledge Management: A System Dynamics Based Analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice , 13(2), June 2012.
  • Atkinson, R. (1999). Project Management: Cost, Time And Quality, Two Best Guesses And A Phenomenon, It’s Time To Accept Other Success Criteria. International Journal Of Project Management , 17, 337-342, 1999.
  • Baccarini, D. (2008). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal , 30, 25, 1999.PMI, A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge: Project Management Institute, 2008.
  • Barclay, R. O. & Murray, P. H. C. (2004). What Is Knowledge Management? Knowledge Praxis, Retrieved 17 April 2013 from http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/what_is_knowledge_management.pdf
  • Bettoni, M. & Schneider, S. (2002). The Essence of Knowledge Management, A More Appropriate Understanding of Knowledge. Basel University of Applied Sciences. Muttenz, Switzerland.
  • Presented at Conference of Knowledge Management 2002, London, 17. April 2002
  • Boucher, K. D., Conners, K., Johnson, J. & Robinson, J. (2001). Development & Management Collaborating on Project Success, Software Magazine, February/March
  • Cavaleri, S. & Reed, F. (2008). Leading Dynamically Complex Projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business , 1(1), 71-87. doi: 10.1108/17538370810846423.
  • Daniel, E. & Williams, J. L. (2011). People, Process, Technology Strategy for Enterprise 2.0, July 2011Retrieved 18 April 2013 from http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/People-Process-TechnologyEnterprise2.pdf
  • Davidson, C. & Voss, P. H. (2002). Knowledge Management: An Introduction to Creating Competitive Advantage from Intellectual Capital, Auckland, N.Z. Tandem Press, 2002, ISBN 1877178942 (pbk.).
  • De Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of Project Success. International Journal of Project Management , 6, 164-169, 1988
  • Dietrich, P. & Lehtonen, P. (2005). Successful Management of Strategic Intentions through Multiple Projects, Reflections from Empirical Study. International Journal of Project Management , 23(5), 386–391.
  • Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., Shenhar, A. & Tishler, A. (1998). In Search of Project Classification: A Non-Universal Approach to Project Success Factors. Research Policy , 27, 915-935, 1998.
  • Garel, G. & Midler, C. (2001). Front-Loading Problem-Solving in Co-Development: Managing the Contractual, Organizational and Cognitive Dimensions. Journal of Automotive Technology and Management , 3(1).
  • Griffin, A. & Page, A. L. (1996). PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 13, 478-496, 1996.
  • Ika, L. A. (2009). Project Success as a Topic in Project Management Journals. Project Management Journal , 40, 6-19, 2009.
  • Johanson, G. A. & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 70(3), 394-400. doi: 10.1177/0013164409355692.
  • Jugdev, K. & MÜller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal , 36, 19-30, 2005
  • Maylor, H. (2006). Special Issue on Rethinking Project Management (EPSRC network 2004-2006). International Journal of Project Management , 24(8), 635-637
  • McElroy, M. W. (2000). Integrating Complexity Theory, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Journal of Knowledge Management , 4(3), 195-203.
  • Mishra, A., Sinha, K. & Thirumalai, S. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency across Distributed Project Organizations: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Retrieved 17 April 2013 from http://doku.iab.de/fdz/events/2009/Mishra_Sinha_Thirumalai.pdf
  • Milis, K., Meulders, M. & Mercken, R. (2003). A Quasi-Experimental Approach to Determining Success Criteria for Projects, In System Sciences, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2003, 12.
  • Nissen, M. E. (1999). Knowledge-Based Knowledge Management in the Re-engineering Domain, Journal of Decision Support Systems, 27, 1350-5238
  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics Of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN-13: 978-0195092691
  • Patanakul, P. & Milosevic, D. (2009). The Effectiveness in Managing a Group of Multiple Projects: Factors of Influence and Measurement Criteria. International Journal of Project Management , 27(3), 216–233.
  • Parikh, M. (2001). Knowledge Management Framework for High-Tech Research and Development. Journal of Engineering Management , 13(3), 27–33.
  • Pinto, J. K. & Slevin, D. P. (1988).Project Success: Definitions and Measurement Techniques, Project Management Journal, vol. xix, No. 1, Project Management Institute, Upper Darby, PA, 1988, 70-71.
  • Shenhar, A. J. & Dvir, D. (1996). Toward a Typological Theory of Project Management. Research Policy , 25, 607-632, 1996.
  • Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D. & Levy, O. (1997). Mapping the Dimensions of Project Success. Project Management Journal , 28(2), 5-13.
  • Shenhar, A. J. (1998). From Theory to Practice: Toward a Typology of Project Management Styles. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 41(1), 33-48, 1998.
  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains. Management Science , 47, 394-414 2001.
  • Whitty, S. J. & Maylor, H. (2009). And then came complex project management (revised). International Journal of Project Management , 27(2009) 304-310, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.004.
  • Zhiye, H., Poli, M. & Mithiborwala, H. S. (2009). Project Strategy: Success Themes for Strategic Projects, In Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009, Portland International Conference on, 2009, 1282-1289.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Azarian, M. S., Yunus, Y. A., & Dahlan, A. R. A. (2013). Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in Achieving Success in Malaysian Government Agencies: A Literature Review. Information Management and Business Review, 5(7), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v5i7.1058

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2013-07-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Information Management and Business Review welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission