Author

  • M. Dharani

    • Department of Commerce, Pondicherry University, Puducherry–605014, India
    • India
  • P. Natarajan

    • Department of Commerce, Pondicherry University, Puducherry–605014, India
    • India

Abstract

The present study empirically examines the risk and return of the Nifty Shariah index and Nifty index during the period 2nd January 2007 to 31st December 2010. The sample period is further divided into bull market period and bear market period based on the movement of the both indices during the study period. The objective of the study is to analyse the performance of the Islamic index and common index and to test whether any significant difference between both indices in India. Based on the previous studies, the present paper employs Risk adjusted measurement such as Sharpe index, Treynor Index and Jensen alpha. The t- test is used to test the mean returns difference between both indices. The study found that Nifty Shariah has been underperformed during the sample and sub sample period. According to t- test, the mean difference between both indices has not been significant which reveals both are consistent. The risk adjusted returns for the both indices reveals that both were underperforming with respect to risk free rate of return. The study has also disclosed the low volatile nature of Nifty Shariah than Nifty index. Finally, the study concludes that Nifty Shariah and Nifty indices in India are performing in a similar manner.

Keywords

References

  • Ahmad & Ibrahim. (2002). A Study of Performance of the KLSE Shariah Index, Malaysian Management Journal , 6 (1&2): 25-34.
  • Albaity, M. and Ahmad, R. (2008). Performance of Shariah and Composite Indices: Evidence from Bursa Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance . 4(1): 23-43.
  • Beik, S. I. and Wardhana, W. (2009). The Relationship between Jakarta Islamic Index and Other Selected Markets: Evidence from Impulse Response Function. Persatuan Pelajar Indonesia International Islamic University Malaysia. ppi-iium.org/.../The%20Relationship%20between %20JII% 20&% 20US.pdf.
  • Carhart, M. M., (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52: 57-82.
  • Dharani M., & Natarajan, P. (2011). Seasonal Anomalies between S&P CNX Nifty Shariah Index and S&P CNX Nifty Index in India. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(3): 101-108.
  • Girard, E. & Hassan, K. M. (2006). Faith-Based Ethical Investing: The Case of Dow Jones Islamic Indexes. Available in papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id= 1808853.
  • Hakim. S. & Rashidian, M. (2002). Risk and Return of the Islamic Stock Market. Paper presented at the presentation to Economic Research Forum Annual Meetings, Sharjah, UAE.
  • Hakim, S. & Manochehr, R. (2004). Risk & Return of Islamic Stock Market Indexes. Paper presented at the International Seminar of Non-bank Financial Institutions: Islamic Alternatives, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Hakim, S. & Rashidian, M. (2004). How costly is investor’s compliance to Shariah? Paper presented at the 11th Economic Research Forum Annual Conference in Sharjah, U.A.E. on December 14-16, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Jensen, M. C. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance , 23: 389–419.
  • Hussein, A. K. (2004). Ethical Investment: Empirical Evidence from FTSE Islamic Index. Islamic Economic Studies, 12(1): 21-40.
  • Hussein, A. K. (2005). Islamic Investment: Evidence From Dow Jones and FTSE Indices, Working paper, Islamic Business Research Centre, Norway.
  • Mohd Dali, N. R. S. B., Mudasir, H. H. and Hamid, S. A. (2008). Performance of Shariah compliance companies in the plantation industry. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management . 1(2): 166–178.
  • Rahman, F. A. and Wajdi, F. M. (2006). Dividend Signaling Hypothesis and Agency Cost: An Investigation on Shariah and Non Shariah Compliant Firms in Kuala Lumpur. Shariah Index Empirika , 19(1): 1- 9.
  • Sadeghi, M. (2008). Financial Performance of Shariah-Compliant Investment: Evidence from Malaysian Stock Market. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics , 20: 15-26.
  • Saharudin S., Hussein A., Abu s. Adu B. and Hasniza Mohd T. (2005). Volatility Trends of Shariah Index Returns and Kuala Lumpur Composite Index . Journal Shariah , 13(2): 65-91.
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Pricing: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance , 19(September): 425-42.
  • Seng, K., Gianluigi. G. and Jason, L. (2009). Performance of Shariah-Compliant Indices in London and NY Stock Markets and their potential for diversification. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance , 2(3/4): 398–408.
  • Treynor, J.L. (1965) How to Rate Management of Investment Funds. Harvard Business Review, vol. 43, January–February, pp. 63–75. www.kantakji.com/fiqh/Files/ Markets/ Khaled_A_Hussein_1.pdf
  • Yusof, M. R. and Abd. Majid, S. M. (2007). Stock Market Volatility Transmission in Malaysia: Islamic Versus Conventional Stock Market J. KAU: Islamic Econ . 20(2): 17-35.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Dharani, M., & Natarajan, P. (2011). Equanimity of Risk and Return Relationship between Shariah Index and General Index in India. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2(5), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v2i5.239

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2011-05-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission