Author

  • Myat Su Yin

    • School of Management, Shinawatra University, Graduate Campus, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    • Thailand
  • John Walsh

    • School of Management, Shinawatra University, Graduate Campus, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
    • Thailand

Abstract

In June 2010, the Thai government proposed improved investment tax incentive schemes to attract more foreign companies to establish Regional Operating Headquarters (ROH) in Thailand. The major theme of incentive packages has historically been the waiving of income tax on ROHs locating in the Kingdom. In the wake of recent political crises, these tax benefits are considered as important measures in reinforcing the Kingdom’s position as an important manufacturing and service hub for the ASEAN region. While investor confidence was wavering because of the unstable political environment that has appertained since 2006, investors are weighing business continuity and safety concerns against the provided and proposed incentives. This paper briefly compares the original ROH tax incentives from 2002 with the new ones, examines the factors contributing to the establishment of Thailand as a hub for ROHs and analyzes the competitiveness of Thailand in comparison with Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia in the context of national competitiveness for establishing ROH. National competitiveness is measured by using the Double Diamond-based nine factor model (IPS Model) from the IPS national competitiveness research study.

Keywords

References

  • Aoki, A. & Tachiki, D. (1992). Overseas Japanese Business Operations: The Emerging Role. Rim: Pacific Business and Industries , 24(1), 28–39.
  • Avenell, S. (1996). Competition for Corporate Regional Headquarters. Working Paper No. 67, Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
  • Blair, D. (1999). Corporate Treasury in Singapore. The Treasurer , May, 15-17.
  • Cantwell, J. A. (1989). Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations . Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Census and Statistics Department (2009). Hong Kong Statistics. Available at: http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/statistical_tables/index.jsp?charsetID=1&subjectI D=5&tableID=133.
  • Daniels, J. D. (1987). Bridging National and Global Marketing Strategies through Regional Operations. International Marketing Review , 2(3): 29– 44.
  • Dicken, P. & Kirkpatrick, C. (1991). Services-led Development in ASEAN: Transnational Regional Headquarters in Singapore. The Pacific Review , 4(2), 174–184.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1988). Multinationals, Technology and Competitiveness . London: Unwin and Hyman.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1999). Governments, Globalization and International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Forsgren, M., Holm, U. & Johanson J. (1995). Division Headquarters Go Abroad: A Step in the Internationalization of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of Management Studies , 32(4), 475– 491.
  • Grosse, R. (1981). Regional Offices of MNCs. Management International Review, 21: 48–55.
  • Guimón, J. (2008), Government Strategies to Attract R&D-Intensive FDI. Paper Presented at the OECD Global Forum on International Investment.
  • Heenan, D. A. (1979). The Regional Headquarters Decision: A Comparative Analysis. Academy of Management Journal , 22(2), 410–415.
  • Ho, K. C. (1998). Corporate Regional Functions in Asia Pacific. Asia Pacific Viewpoint , 39(2), 179–191
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Foreign Direct Investment Statistics: How Countries Measure FDI 2001 . New York: International Monetary Fund.
  • IPS National Competitiveness Research (2010), IPS National Competitiveness Research (2009-2010). Seoul: IPS.
  • Kumarapathy, S. (1994). Singapore: A Base for MNCs’ Regional Headquarters in Asia. Economic Research Desk, Briefing 43 . Singapore: Development Bank of Singapore.
  • Lasserre, P. (1996). Regional Headquarters: The Spearhead for Asia Pacific Markets. Long Range Planning, 29(1), 30–37.
  • Lee, B. H. (2002). FDI from Developing Countries: A Vector for Trade and Development. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Development Centre.
  • Murphy, A. (2000). Solving the problems of globalization, Treasury Management International (May), 49-54. Available online: http://www.fti.ie.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005). OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators . Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Panich, P. (2010). A Guide to the New Tax Regime for Regional Corporate HQs. The Nation . Available at: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/06/30/opinion/A-guide-to-the-new-tax-regimefor-regional-corpora-30132715.html.
  • Perry, M. (1992). Promoting Corporate Control in Singapore. Regional Studies, 26(3), 289–294.
  • Perry, M. (1995). New Corporate Structures, Regional Offices and Singapore’s New Economic Directions. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography , 16(2), 181–196.
  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations . New York: The Free Press.
  • Roslan, R. R. & Polak, P. (2009). Can Brunei Darussalam be Asia’s Next Leading Location for Regional Treasury Centres. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics , 29: 7-23.
  • RSM International (2010). [Online]. SE Asian Regional Headquarter Companies. http://www.rsmchiolim.com.sg/iadvisory/ROH_SE_Asian_Regional_Headquarters_Companies_RSMT _June_2010.pdf.
  • Sullivan, D. (1992). Organization in American MNCs: the perspective of the European regional headquarters. Management International Review . 32(3), 237–250.
  • Tavares, A. & Young, S. (2005). FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies. International Journal of the Economics of Business , 12(1): 3–16.
  • Visuttipat, C. (2010) Thailand: Rethinking Regional Operating Headquarters. International Tax Review . Available at: http://www.internationaltaxreview.com.
  • Watanabe, R. (1998). Developing Taiwan into a Regional Finance and Operations Centre: A Taxation Perspective. Revenue Law Journal . 8(1), 88-121.
  • Yeung, H. W., Poon, J. & Perry, M. (2001). Towards a Regional Strategy: The Role of Regional Headquarters of Foreign Firms in. Urban Studies , 38(1), 157–183.
  • Young, S., Hood., N. & Peter, E. (1994). Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development. Regional Studies , 28(7), 657-677.
  • Zilva, A. D (2004). Tax Concessions for Regional Operating Headquarter Companies: A Comparative Study of Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Australia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 6(1), 36-62.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Yin, M. S., & Walsh, J. (2011). Analyzing the Factors Contributing to the Establishment of Thailand as a Hub for Regional Operating Headquarters. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2(6), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v2i6.245

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2011-06-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission