Author

  • Jatinder Singh

    • Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

Abstract

India announced series of liberalization measures since mid 1980s that inter-alia led to an unprecedented increase in the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI). Evidence suggests that the rising inflows of FDI have influence on host country market structure though the direction is uncertain. Analytically, market structure has implications on the long run growth path of an economy through its effect on the allocation of economic resources among various economic activities including innovation. In this context, the objective of this paper is to analyze the bearing of FDI on market concentration with special reference to India’s manufacturing industries during the post-reform period. The study made use of firm level and product level data and panel regression techniques to fulfill the objective. The estimated model has shown a positive and significant influence of FDI on market concentration. If the result of the study is any indication, the increased inflow of FDI is likely to make India’s manufacturing sector more concentrated and calls for policy measures to mitigate undesirable outcomes of FDI inflows.

Keywords

References

  • Athreye, S., and Kapur, S. (2006). Industrial Concentration in a Liberalizing Economy: A Study of Indian Manufacturing. Journal of Development Studies , 42 (6), 981-999.
  • Baltagi, H., B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data . U.K: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Basant, R., and Saha, S., N. (2005). Determinants of Entry in the Indian Manufacturing Sector. Working Paper No. 2005-01, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
  • Beena, P., L. (2004). Towards Understanding the Merger-Wave in the Indian Corporate Sector: A Comparative Perspective. Working Paper No. 355, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • Beena, S. (2006). Merger and Acquisition in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: An Exploratory Analysis. M. Phil Thesis, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • Bhaskar, V. (1992). Concentration in Indian Manufacturing, M. Phil Thesis. Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • Blalock, G. and Gertler, P., J. (2009). How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology. Journal of Development Economics , 90(2), 192–199.
  • Blomstrom, M. (1986). Multinationals and Market Structure in Mexico. World Development, 14(4): 523–530.
  • Bhalotra, R. S. (1998). The Puzzle of Jobless Growth in Indian Manufacturing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 5-32.
  • Braunerhjelmon, P. and Oxelheim, L. (1999). Does Foreign Direct Investment Replace Home Country Investment? The Effect of European Integration on the Location of Swedish Investment. Working paper No. 522, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  • Bourlakis, C., A. (1987). Multinational Corporations and Domestic Market Structure: The Case of Greek Manufacturing Industries. Review of World Economics, 123(4), 719–733.
  • Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational Enterprises and Economics Analysis. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Caves, R.,E. and Porter, M., E. (1980). The Dynamics of Changing Seller Concentration, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 29(1), 1-15.
  • Cho, K., R. (1990). Foreign Banking Presence and Banking Market Concentration: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Studies, 27(1), 98-110.
  • Curry, B., and George, K., D. (1983). Industrial Concentration: A Survey. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 31(3), 203-255.
  • Dalton, J., A. and Hamm, L., G. (1974). Growth and Product Differentiability as Factors Influencing Changes in Concentration. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 22(3), 235-240.
  • Driffield, N. (2001). Inward Investment and Host Country Market Structure: The Case of the U.K. Review of Industrial Organization, 18 (4), 363-378.
  • Dunning, J., H. and Lundan, S., M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy . U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Fu, X. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment, Absorptive Capacity and Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from China. Oxford Development Studies , 36(1), 89-110.
  • Ghosh, A. (1975). Concentration and Growth of Indian Industries 1948-68. Journal of Industrial Economics, 23(3), 203-22.
  • Giarratana, M.; Pagano, A. and Torrisi, S. (2003). Links between multinational firms and domestic firms: a comparison of the software industry in India. Ireland and Israel, Working Paper No. 22; LME, Italy.
  • Government of India. (2001). Handbook of Industrial Policy and Statistics. Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi.
  • Haller, S. (2004). The Impact of Multinational Entry on Domestic Market Structure and R and D. Mimeo; European University Institute.
  • Jeong, K., Y. and Masson, R., T. (1990). Market Structure, Entry and Performance in Korea. Review of Economic and Statistics, 72(3), 455-62.
  • Joseph, K.J. (1997). Industry under Economic Liberalization: The Case of Indian Electronics. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
  • Kambhampati, U., S. (1996). Industrial Concentration and Performance: A Study of Structure, Conduct and Performance of Indian Industry. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Kambhampati, U., S. (1998). Market Structure Dynamics in Indian Industry. Bulletin of Economic Research, 50 (2), 133–53.
  • Kindleberger, C., P. (1969). American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Krishna, P. and Mitra, D. (1998). Trade liberalization, market discipline and productivity growth: new evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 56(2), 447-462.
  • Kumar, N. (1990). Mobility barrier and Profitability of Multinational and local enterprises in Indian manufacturing. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (4), 449-463.
  • Lall, S. (1979). Multinational and Market Structure in an open Developing Economy: The Case of Malaysia. Review of World Economies, 115(2), 325-350.
  • Lall, S., and Mohammad, S. (1983): Foreign Ownership and Export Performance in Large Corporate of India. Journal of Development Studies, 20(1), 56-67.
  • Lundin, N.; Sjoholm, F.; He, P. and Qian, J. (2007) FDI, Market Structure and R and D Investments in China. Working Paper No. 708, The International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development, Kitakyushu.
  • Mann, H., M. (1966). Seller Concentration, Barriers to Entry and Rates of Return in Thirty Industries, 19501960. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 48(3), 296-307.
  • Markusen, J., R. and Venables, A., J. (1997): Foreign Direct Investment as a Catalyst for Industrial Development. Working Paper No: 5696, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Melitz, M., J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
  • Nair, A. (2008). Competition in Indian Manufacturing Industries: Identification, Analysis and Impact. M. Phil Thesis, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (2006). The National Strategy for Manufacturing. National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council, Government of India.
  • Newfarmer, R. and Marsh, L. (1981). Industrial Independence and Development: A Study of International Linkage and International Performance in Brazil. Mimeo; University of Notro Dame.
  • Newfarmer, R. S. (1979). TNC Takeovers in Brazil: The Uneven Distribution of Benefits in the Market for Firms. World Development, 7(1), 25-43.
  • Orr, D. (1974). The Determinants of Entry: A Study of the Canadian Manufacturing Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(1), 58-66.
  • Pant, M. and Pattanayak, M. (2005). Does Openness Promote Competition? A Case Study of Indian Manufacturing. Economic and Political Weekly , 40(39), 4226-4231.
  • Pavcnik, N. (2002). Trade Liberalization, Exit and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants. Review of Economic Studies , 69(3), 245– 276.
  • Peria, M., S. and Mody, A. (2004). How Foreign Participation and Market Concentration Impact Bank Spreads: Evidence from Latin America. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3210, World Bank.
  • Petrochilos, G.A. (1989). Foreign Direct Investment and the Development Process. England: Gower Publishing Company.
  • Pushpangadan, K. and Shanta, N. (2008). Product Market Competition and Employment in the Organized Manufacturing Sector in India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 51(3), 381-396.
  • Reserve Bank of India (2006). Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy. Annual Publication of RBI, Mumbai.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd edition, New York: Harper.
  • Secretariat for Industrial Approval (2009). Annual Report, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce, Government of India.
  • Siegfried, J., J. and Evans, L. B. (1994). Empirical Studies of Entry and Exit: A Survey of the Evidence. Review of Industrial Organization, 9(2), 121-155.
  • Singh, J. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment and Market Structure: Evidence from India’s Manufacturing sector. M. Phil Thesis, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • Subramanian, K.K. (2005). Economic Reforms Market Structure and Innovations in Indian Industry. Project Report, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala.
  • Subramanian, K., K., and Joseph, J., K. (1994). Foreign Control and Export Intensity of Firms in Indian Industry. Working Paper No. 258, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvandrum, Kerala.
  • Subramanian, K., K. (1971). Market Structure and R and D Activity: A Case of the Chemical Industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 6(35), 115-119.
  • Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising and the Evolution of Concentration, London: MIT Press.
  • Sutton, J. (1998). Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History. London: MIT Press.
  • Sutton, J. (2007): Quality, Trade and the Moving Window: The Globalization Process. The Economic Journal , 117(524), 469-498.
  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (1997). Transnational Corporations, Market Structure and Competition Policy. World Investment Report, Geneva and New York, United Nations.
  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2009). Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production and Development. World Investment Report, Geneva and New York, United Nations.
  • Willmore, L. (1989). Determinants of Industrial Structure: A Brazilian Case Study. World Development, 17 (10), 1601-1617.
  • Yun, M. (2001). Impact of FDI on Competition in Korean Manufacturing Industries: 1991-97. Mimeo; Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Singh, J. (2011). Inward Investment and Market Structure in an Open Developing Economy: A Case of India’s Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2(6), 286-297. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v2i6.246

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2011-06-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission