Author

  • Muhammad Akram

    • Faculty of Commerce, Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Lahore-Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Hassan Mobeen Alam

    • Faculty of Commerce, Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Lahore-Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Liaqat Ali

    • Faculty of Commerce, Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Lahore-Pakistan
    • Pakistan
  • Muhammad Muazzam Mughal

    • Faculty of Commerce, Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Lahore-Pakistan
    • Pakistan

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to analyze which leadership behavior is most closely related with organizational performances based on both leader’s and employee’s perceived; and to what extent leadership behaviors have impact on organizational performances in public and private organizations. Two questionnaires were developed to capture leaders’ behaviors and employees’ responses. Sample comprises of five hundred managers and five hundred employees of different private and public sector organizations of Pakistan. Correlation analysis and regression analysis are used to analyze relationship and effects of leadership behaviors with and on organizational performances. Results indicate that: firstly, all leadership behaviors are positively interrelated with leader is perceived and employee has perceived organizational performances. Secondly, only monitoring leadership behavior has significant positive impact on leader’s and employee’s perceived organizational performance based on individual analysis; whereas, innovative role modeling, support for innovation, recognition and monitoring leadership behaviors have significant positive impact on leader’s perceived and employee’s perceived organizational performances based on pooled analysis.

Keywords

References

  • Ali, I., Rehman, K. U., Ali, S. I., Yousaf, J. & Zia, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management , 4(12), 2796-2801.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics , 3, 19-31.
  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
  • Boerner, S., Eisenbeiss, S. A. & Griesser, D. (2007). Follower Behavior and Organizational Performance: The Impact of Transformational Leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies , 13(3), 15-26.
  • Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings, and future direction. Academy of Management Review , 20, 343-78.
  • Clark, K. B. & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review , 13(3), 471-82.
  • Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A. & Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Delaney, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal , 39(4), 949–969.
  • Elenkov, D. S. (2002). Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research , 55(6), 467–480.
  • Fletcher, J. K. & Kaufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: paradox and possibility, Thousand Oaks, CA, 21-47.
  • Gardner, T. M. (2005). Inter-firm competition for human resources: evidence from the software industry. Academy of Management Journal , 48(2), 237-56.
  • Guthrie, J. P., Liu, W., Flood, P. C. & MacCurtain, S. (2008). High performance work systems, workforce productivity, and innovation: A comparison of MNCs and indigenous firms. LINK Working Paper Series 04-08. Retrieved from: http:/link.dcu.ie/wp0408.pdf.
  • Jong, J. P. J. & Hartog, D. N. D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management , 10 (1), 41-64.
  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal , 38(3), 635-672.
  • Kessler, E. H. & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review , 21(4), 1143-91.
  • Li-Fei, X. B. & Hua, J. (2010). Effects of Leadership Behavior on Organizational Performance in Research University. Management and Service Sciences, (MASS), 1-4.
  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G. & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly , 7(3), 385-425.
  • Obiwuru, T. C., Okwu, A. T., Akpa, V. O. & Nwankwere, I. A. (2011). Effects of Leadership Style on Organizational Performance: A Survey of Selected Small Scale Enterprises in Ikosi-Ketu Council Development Area of Lagos State, Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research , 1(7), 100-111.
  • Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the how's and why's of leadership . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stoffers, M. M. J. & Heijden, V. D. B. (2009). Towards an HRM Model predicting Organizational Performance by Enhancing Innovative Work Behavior: A Study among Dutch SMEs in the Province of Limburg. Business Leadership Review , 6(4), 1-13.
  • Van-de-Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science , 32, 590-608.
  • Van-Loo, J. & De-Grip, A. (2003). Loont het investeren in personeel? [Are investments made in employees profitable?] Maastricht: Researchcentrum voor Onderwijs en Arbeidsmarkt, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht.
  • Wang, F. J., Chich-Jen, S. & Mei-Ling, T. (2010). Effect of leadership style on organizational performance as viewed from human resource management strategy. African Journal of Business Management , 4(18), 3924-3936.
  • Wanga, H., Tsuib, A. S. & Xind, K. R. (2011). CEO leadership behaviors, organizational performance, and employees' attitudes. The Leadership Quarterly , 22(1), 92-105.
  • Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U. & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The Leadership Quarterly , 16, 879−919.
  • Zaccaro, S. J. & Klimoski, R. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: An introduction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Akram, M., Alam, H. M., Ali, L., & Mughal, M. M. (2012). How Leadership Behaviors Affect Organizational Performance in Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(6), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v4i6.335

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2012-06-15

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission