Abstract
The article proposes to explore the importance of policy and procedure as an impetus for establishing a whistle blowing culture. It can be suggested that the institutionalization of a whistle blowing culture through established and practiced policies and procedures can lead to lower levels of perceived retaliation, which is frequently a deterrent in blowing the whistle. The quantitative research method was employed to determine the extent to which higher education institutions implement policies and procedures to institutionalize whistle blowing as an imperative for an ethical organizational culture, which encourages potential whistleblowers to report on wrongdoing. A conceptual framework informed by legislation, policy and procedures was used to determine employee perceptions relating to the role of whistle blowing policies and procedures within the Durban University of Technology as an impetus for establishing a whistle blowing culture. The investigation was based on empirical research conducted at the Durban University of Technology, South Africa and literature on whistle blowing. In the light of the research, recommendations are made relating to institutional whistle blowing policies and procedures. The empirical findings reveal that whistle blowing legislation is inadequate to encourage whistle blowing. The article provides a comprehensive framework for the institutionalization of whistle blowing within the organizational culture as an imperative to encourage disclosure of unethical practices.
Keywords
- Whistle Blowing Search this journal for Whistle Blowing (opens in a new tab)
- Legislation Search this journal for Legislation (opens in a new tab)
- Higher Education Search this journal for Higher Education (opens in a new tab)
- Policies Search this journal for Policies (opens in a new tab)
- Procedures Search this journal for Procedures (opens in a new tab)
- Organizational Culture Search this journal for Organizational Culture (opens in a new tab)
References
- Bhasin, M. (2010). Corporate governance in the Asian countries. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 1964-1971.
- Bowditch, J. L. & Buono, A. F. (2001). A primer on organizational behaviour , New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
- Chen, A. Y. S., Sawyers, R. B. & Williams, P. F. (1997). Reinforcing ethical decision making through corporate culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 855-866.
- De-Maria, W. (2005). Whistleblower protection: Is Africa ready? Public Administration and Development , 25(3), 217-226.
- Dorasamy, N. & Pillay, S. (2011a). Whistle blowing: Impediments to effective implementation within the South African public sector. Corporate ownership and Control , 8(3), 196-208.
- Dorasamy, N. & Pillay, S. (2011b). Institutionalising a value enacted dominant organizational culture: An impetus for whistle blowing. Corporate ownership and Control , 8(3), 297-304.
- Dryburgh, M. M. (2009). Personal and public implications of whistle blowing: The case of Corcoran State Prison. Public Integration, 11(2), 155-170.
- Ethics Resource Centre. (2007). Natural Business Ethics Survey: An inside view of private sector ethics . Arlington, VA: Ethics Resource Centre.
- Hellreigel, D., Slocum, J. W. & Woodman, R. W. (1998). Organizational behaviour , South-Western College Publishing: Ohio.
- IOD. (2002). Second King Report on Corporate Governance , Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
- Kaplan, E. (2001). The international emergence of legal protection of whistleblowers. Journal of Public Enquiry, 2, 37-42.
- Kouzes, T. M. & Posner, B. J. (1987). The leadership challenge , San Francisco: Sage.
- Lewis, D., Ellis, C. A., Kyprianou, A. & Homewood, S. (2001). Whistle blowing at work The results of a survey of procedures in further and higher education. Education and the law , 13(3), 215-225.
- Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P. & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). A word to the wise: How managers and policy makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 379-396.
- Near, J. P. & Miceli, M. P. (1996). Whistle blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management , 22(3), 507526.
- Pillay, S., Dorasamy, N. & Vedran, V. (2012). Exploring whistle blowing intentions in South Africa: A quantitative analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 5(28), 6579-6595.
- Pillay, S. & Dorasamy, N. (2011). Systemic factors moderating effective whistle blowing: an exploratory study into public service organization. African Journal of Business Management , 5(22), 94299439.
- Shahinpoor, N. & Matt, B. F. (2007). The power of one: Dissent and organizational life. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 37-48.
- South Africa. (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No 108 of 1996, Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (2000). The Protected Disclosures Act No 26 of 2000 , Pretoria: Government Printer.
- Sullivan, J. D. (2009). The moral compass of Companies: Business ethics and corporate governance as anti-corruption tools , Washington: International Finance Corporation.
- Van-Vuuren, L. (2008). Ethics and / in organization development”. In C.L. Van Tonder and G. Roodt (eds.), Organizational development: Theory and Practice , Van Schaik Publishers: Pretoria.
- Werner, A. (2008). Organizational culture, ethics and diversity in a global environment. In A. Werner (ed.), Organizational Behaviour: A contemporary South Africa perspective , Van Schaik: Pretoria.
- Zhang, J., Chiu, R. K. & Wei, L-Q. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistle blowing behaviour in China: Empirical evidence and implication. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 25-41.
- Vinten, G. (1999). Whistle blowing code for educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Management , 13(3), 150-157.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2012 N Dorasamy (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
- Whistle Blowing Search this journal for Whistle Blowing (opens in a new tab)
- Legislation Search this journal for Legislation (opens in a new tab)
- Higher Education Search this journal for Higher Education (opens in a new tab)
- Policies Search this journal for Policies (opens in a new tab)
- Procedures Search this journal for Procedures (opens in a new tab)
- Organizational Culture Search this journal for Organizational Culture (opens in a new tab)
Section
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission