Abstract
This paper introduces and applies the bootstrap method to compare the power of the test for asymmetry in the Granger and Lee (1989) and Von Cramon-Taubadel and Loy (1996) models. The results of the bootstrap simulations indicate that the power of the test for asymmetry depends on various conditions such as the bootstrap sample size, model complexity, difference in adjustment speeds and the amount of noise in the data generating process used in the application. The true model achieves greater power when compared with the complex model. With small bootstrap sample size or large noise, both models display low power in rejecting the (false) null hypothesis of symmetry.
Keywords
References
- Acquah, H. D. (2012). A Bootstrap Approach to Testing for Symmetry in the Granger and Lee Asymmetric Error Correction Model. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences , 11(11), 3336.
- Acquah, H. D. (2010). Testing for Symmetry in the Houck’s Model. Indian Development Review: An International Journal of Development Economics , 8(1), 105-107.
- Acquah, H. D. & Von Cramon-Taubadel, S. (2009). A Monte Carlo Comparison of the Power of Tests for Non-Linearity in Asymmetric Price Transmission Models. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research and Application , 3(2), 281-283.
- Cook, S., Holly, S. & Turner, P. (1999a). The power of tests for non-linearity: the case of Granger–Lee asymmetry . Economics Letters , 62, 155–59.
- Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica , 55, 251-276.
- Granger, C. W. J. & Lee, T. H. (1989). Investigation of production, sales and inventory relationships using multicointegration and non-symmetric error correction models. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 4, 135-159.
- Houck, J. P. (1977). An Approach to specifying and estimating nonreversible Functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 59, 570-572.
- Von Cramon-Taubadel, S. & Loy, J. P. (1996). Price asymmetry in the international wheat market: Comment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 44, 311-317.
Downloads
No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.
How to Cite
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Henry De-Graft Acquah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
Keywords
Section
Published in
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2013)
SME Digital Adoption, Policy & Macroeconomic Dynamics
View issue contents
Published
Submissions
Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.
Make a Submission