Author

  • Fengwei Sun

    • College of Economics, Southwest University for Nationalities, China
    • China

  • Xunzhou Ma

    • College of Economics, Southwest University for Nationalities, China
    • China

  • Xiaoxiao Wang

    • College of Economics, Southwest University for Nationalities, China
    • China

  • Quanlan Yi

    • College of Economics, Southwest University for Nationalities, China
    • China

  • Mengliang Wu

    • College of Economics, Southwest University for Nationalities, China
    • China

Abstract

Recent investigations have uncovered large, consistent deviations from the predictions of Homo economics that individuals are entirely self-regarding. Our study undertook a cross-cultural study of behavior search for the evidences of other-regarding behaviors and its ethnic difference, and accounted for by anatomy of culture. This study recruited 90 subjects of three ethnic groups from market trade-based (ethnic Han), nomadism-based (ethnic Zang) and agriculture-based (ethnic Bouyei) areas in China and conducted public good provision experiment with stranger-treatment design. Under the assumption of self-regarding preferences, the Nash equilibrium is zero contribution by all in public account using backward induction. However, we found contributions did not reduce to zero over all three sessions. Besides, the differences in contributions between ethnicities strongly depended on the degree of ethnic dominance, and Zang harbored the strongest reciprocal preference generally over all group structures. A particular set of measurable factors was identified as proxies for cultural influences on behavioral differences observed in experiments between ethnicities. The results showed all of the cultural factors accounted for the behavioral differences between the ethnic Han and the other two minor ethnicities. However, behavioral difference between minor ethnicities was attributed to group structure only. (1) People may harbor various forms of prosocial emotions in economic affairs, and especially exhibit stronger at the initial phase rather than what canonical model assumes. (2) Behavioral differences between ethnicities are prominent and can be explained by differences in cultural influence.

Keywords

References

  • Andreoni, J. & Schols, J. K. (1990). An Economic Analysis of Charitable Giving With Interdependent Preferences, Working papers 90-23, Wisconsin Madison-Social Systems.
  • Andreoni, J. & Miller, J. (2002). Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism. Econometrica , 70(2), 737-53.
  • Andreoni, J. (1995). Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? American Economic Review , 85(4), 891–904
  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments. Journal of Public Economics , 37(3), 291–304.
  • Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics , 9(3), 193-208.
  • Bagnoli, M., & McKee, M. (1991). Voluntary Contribution Games: Efficient Private Provision of Public Goods. Economic Inquiry , 92(2), 351–366.
  • Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.
  • Becker, G. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Becker, G. (1993). The evidence against Banks Doesn’t prove bias. Business Week , 19(4), 18
  • Benjamin, D. J., Choi, J. J. & Fisher, G. (2013). Religious identity and economic behavior. Cornell University mimeo, August. Revise and resubmit, Review of Economics and Statistics.
  • Betancourt, H. & Regeser, L. S. (1993). The Study of Culture, Ethnicity, and Race in American Psychology. American Psychologist , 48(6), 629-637.
  • Botelho, A., Harrison, G. W., Pinto-Costa, L. M. & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Testing Static Game Theory with Dynamic Experiments: A Case Study of Public Goods. Games and Economic Behavior , 67(1), 253–265.
  • Burlando, R. & Hey, J. (1997). Do Anglo-Saxons Free-Ride More? Journal of Public Economics , 64(1), 41–60.
  • Camerer, C. (1997). Progress in Behavior Game Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 11(4), 167-188.
  • Cameron, L. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry , 37(1), 47–59.
  • Cason, T. J., Saijo, T. & Yamato, T. (2002). Voluntary Participation and Spite in Public Good Provision Experiments: An International Comparison. Experimental Economics , 5(2), 133–153.
  • Castro, M. F. (2008). Where Are You From? Cultural Differences in Public Good Experiments. The Journal of Socio-Economics , 37(6), 2319–2329.
  • Chen, Y. (2010). Test of Social Preferences: An Experimental Study Beyond Homo Economics. Dissertation, Zhejiang University, China. (In Chinese)
  • Choi, J. K. & Ahn, T. K. (2003). Strategic Reward and Altruistic Punishment Support Cooperation in A Public Goods Game Experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology , 35 (C), 17–30.
  • Chuah, S. W., Hoffmann, R., Jonesb, M. & Williams, G. (2009). An economic anatomy of culture: Attitudes and behavior in inter-and intra-national ultimatum game experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology , 30(5), 732-744.
  • Darley, J. M. & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 27(1), 100 –8.
  • De Cremer, D. & Van-Vugt, M. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: the effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of personality and social psychology , 76(4), 587599.
  • Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving Forces behind Informal Sanctions. Econometrica , 73(6), 2017–2030.
  • Falk, A. & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A Theory of Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior , 54(2), 293–315.
  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature , 415(10), 137–140.
  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiment. American Economic Review , 90(4), 980-994.
  • Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 114(3), 817-868.
  • Fenton, S. (2010). Ethnicity (second edition). Polity Cambridge, UK.
  • Fershtman, C. & Gneezy, U. (2014). Discrimination in a segmented society: an experimental approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 116(1), 351-377.
  • Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. (2001). Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from A Public Goods Experiment. Economics Letters , 71(3), 397–404.
  • Georgianna, S. L. (1984). Is a religious neighbor a good neighbor? Humbolt Journal of Social Relations , 11(2), 1 –16.
  • Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A. & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring Trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 65(3), 811- 846
  • Hang, Y., Dingding, W. & Weidong, L. (2005). On Endogenetic Preference for Altruism Behaviors and Its Implications to Economics. Economic Research Journal (of China) , 8, 84-94 (In Chinese).
  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. & McElreath, R. (2001). Reciprocity and Punishment in Fifteen Small scale Societies. American Economic Review , 91(2), 73-78.
  • Henrich, J. (2000). Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review , 90(4), 973–979.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture , 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
  • Hua, Z. (2013). Brief History of Ethnic Zang. Nationalities Publishing House, Beijing, 2013
  • Hur, Y. (2013). Racial diversity, is it a blessing to an organization? Examining its organizational consequences in municipal police departments. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 79(1), 149–164.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post modernization: Culture, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Isaac, R. M., Walker, J. M. & Thomas, S. (1984). Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Some Possible Explanations. Public Choice , 43(2), 113-149.
  • Levinson, D. J. & Peng, K. (2007). Valuing cultural differences in behavioral economics. The ICFAI Journal of Behavioral finance , 4(1), 32-47.
  • Li, D. (2000). A study of factors influencing the prosocial behavior of children. Psychological Science , 23(3), 285-381. (in Chinese)
  • Goette, L., Huffman, D. & Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review , 92(2), 212-216
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic behavior? Working paper.
  • Meng, L. (2013). The state of nature as the state of war: Hobbes’s two arguments on the reconstruction of humanity. Journal of Yun Nan university , 13(5), 3-22 (In Chinese).
  • Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the Development of Everyday Social Explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 46(5), 961-978.
  • Neugebauer, T., Perote, J., Schmidt, U. & Malte, L. (2009). Selfish-Biased Conditional Cooperation: On The Decline of Contributions in Repeated Public Goods Experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology , 30(1), 52–60
  • Ockenfels, A. & Weimann, J. (1999). Types and Patterns: An Experimental East-West- German Comparison of Cooperation and Solidarity. Journal of Public Economics , 71(2), 275–287.
  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly , 44(1), 1–28.
  • Pitts, D. & Jarry, E. (2007). Ethnic diversity and organizational performance: Assessing diversity effects at the managerial and street levels. International Public Management Journal , 10(2), 233–254.
  • Posner, D. M. (2004). The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review , 98(4), 529–545.
  • Saroglou, V., Corneille, O. & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). Speak, Lord, your servant is listening: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion , 19(3), 143-154.
  • Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural Psychology - What Is It, in Stigler, J W, Shweder, R A and Herdt, G (eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development, pp. 1-43, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Sonnemans, J., Schram, A. & Offerman, T. (1999). Strategic Behavior in Public Good Games: When Partners Drift Apart. Economics Letters , 62(1), 35–41.
  • Sosis, R. & Ruffle, B. J. (2004). Ideology, religion, and the evolution of cooperation: Field tests on Israeli kibbutzim. Research in Economic Anthropology , 23, 89–117.
  • State Nationalities Affairs Commission. Brief History of Ethnic Bouyei, Nationalities Publishing House, Beijing, 2008.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 65(3), 811- 846.
  • Waring, T. M. & Bell, A. V. (2013). Ethnic dominance damages cooperation more than ethnic diversity: results from multi-ethnic field experiments in India. Evolution and Human Behavior , 34(6), 398–404.
  • Watson, W. E., Kumar, K. & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal , 36(3), 590–602.
  • Wilson, D. S. & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology , 82(4), 327-348.
  • Wolfgang, G. W., Christine, U. & Schmid, B. E. (2009). The Influence of Organizational Democracy on Employees’ Socio-moral Climate and Prosocial Behavioral Orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 30(8), 1127-1149.
  • Zhou, Y. & Song, Z. (2008). The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism of Public Goods: An Experimental Research. Economic Research, 90-104.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Sun, F., Ma, X., Wang, X., Yi, Q., & Wu, M. (2015). Does Culture Matter to Pro-Social Behavior? Evidence from a Cross-Ethnic Lab Experiment. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(6(J), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v7i6(J).621

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Fengwei Sun, Xunzhou Ma, Xiaoxiao Wang, Quanlan Yi, Mengliang Wu (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 7 No. 6(J) (2015) Entrepreneurship, Finance & Behavioural Studies View issue contents

Published

2015-12-30

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission