Author

  • Elvin Shava

    • North West University, South Africa
    • South Africa

  • Tafadzwa Clementine Maramura

    • North West University, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

Chapter 6 of the National Development Plan (NDP) accentuates on the impact of an integrated and inclusive rural economy by proposing for the creation 643 000 direct jobs and 326 000 indirect jobs in the farming and non-farming sector by 2030. Discussion within the study reveals that, the NDP was also designed to stimulate rural economic development among other important dynamic economic factors of the country. However, five years into the implementation of the NDP, remnants of inequality, unemployment and poverty are still apparent amongst the rural population. This paper indicates that the success of NDP as an entrepreneurial mechanism is being underpinned by contestations which are emanating from underfinancing, lack of entrepreneurial education and research culture, negative attitudes of the people, corruption and red tape. Through a qualitative research approach, the paper observes that, for NDP to be continuously coordinated as an economic initiative, financing of rural projects such as small businesses, cooperatives and other rural development projects should be the government’s key priority. The study concludes that entrepreneurship has to be considered as a prime mover in rural economic development in South Africa since an entrepreneurial economy significantly differs from a non-entrepreneurial one, as evidenced by the economic vigour and sustainable development of its inhabitants.

Keywords

References

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Capability and functioning: definition and justification. Human Development and Capability Association Briefing Note. From: http://www.masterhdfs.org/masterHDFS/wpcontent/uploads/2014/05/Alkire-Capability-Functioning-Briefing-Note.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2017.
  • Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA) Annual Report. (2006). From: http://www.thepresidency.gov.za/docs/asgisa2006.pdf, Accessed 04 April 2017.
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2007). Entrepreneurship capital and economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23, 63–78.
  • Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
  • Booysens, I. (2011). Are Small, Medium, and Micro-Sized Enterprises Engines of Innovation? The Reality in South Africa. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 67-78.
  • Bureau for Agricultural Policy (BFAP). (2011). The contribution of the agro-industrial complex to employment in South Africa. Unpublished report prepared for the National Planning Commission.
  • Byrd, W. A. (1987). 'Entrepreneurship, capital and ownership'. Washington, D.C. Mimeo: The World Bank.
  • Chetty, C. in Lebohang, T. (2016). Rebels with a cause: The state of SA's youth on frustration and the fight for economic freedom. From: http://www.smesouthafrica.co.za/16578/Rebels-with-a-cause-The-stateof-youth-2016. Accessed 15-04-2017.
  • Casson, M. (2003). The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory (2nd Ed.). Chelterham: Edward Elgar.
  • Corruption Watch. (2016). Bua Mzansi Annual Report, Vol 1(1). From: https://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Corruption-Watch-AnnualReport-27-02-2017-Low-Res-Version.pdf. Accessed 04-04-2017.
  • Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2014). The crossroads - a goldmine or a time bomb? Cape Town: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2016). From GEM: http://www.gemconsortium.org. Accessed 03 April 2017.
  • Hendriks, S. (2013). South Africa’s NDP and New Growth Path: Reflections on policy contradictions and implications on food security. Agrekon, 52(3), 1-17.
  • Knight, F. H. (1921/1985). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand.
  • National Planning Commission (NPC). (2011). Diagnostic overview. Pretoria: National Planning Commission, Office of the Presidency.
  • National Planning Commission (NPC). (2012). National Development Plan. Pretoria: National Planning Commission, Office of the Presidency.
  • Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Petrin, T. (1992). 'Is Entrepreneurship Possible in Public Enterprises'?' in J. Prokopenko and I. Pavlin (eds.), Entrepreneurship Development in Public Enterprises, ILO, Geneva and International Centre for Public Enterprises in Developing Countries.
  • Plaut, M. (2012). Crime, corruption and political connections. Sunday Times Review, p. 5.
  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capabilities approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.
  • Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University. Cambridge M.A.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1996). The theory of Economic Development. London. Transaction Publishers.
  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. Anchor Books, New York.
  • South African Government Information. (2012). Social development. Available from: www.info.gov.za/aboutsa/socialdev.htm#social-assistance. Accessed on 23 March 2017.
  • South Africa, Department of Trade and Industry. (2005). Integrated Strategy on the Promotion of Entrepreneurship and Small Enterprises. Pretoria.
  • South Africa, Department of Trade and Industry. (2008). Annual review of small business in South Africa 2005-2007. Pretoria: Department of Trade and Industry.
  • Stats SA (Statistics South Africa). (2012b). In-depth analysis of the General Household Survey data. GHS Series 4: Food security and agriculture 2002–2011. Report No. 03-18-03. Pretoria. Statistics SA.
  • StatsSA (Statistics South Africa). (2016). General Household Survey. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
  • South Africa. The Department of the Presidency. (2009). National Income Dynamics Study. Sherino Printers. National Planning Commission.
  • South Africa. The Department of the Presidency. (2015). National Development Plan 2030, Our Future make it works. Sherino Printers. National Planning Commission.
  • Tyson, L. T., Petrin, T. & Rogers, H. (1994). Promoting Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics, 6, 1-20.
  • UNDP. (2010). The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. Human Development Report 2010. New York, UNDP.
  • Watson, L. & Netswera, G. (2009). Support for Rural Small Businesses in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 3, 225-239.
  • Wilken, P. H. (1979). Entrepreneurship. A Comparative and Historical Study. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Young, J. E. & Sexton, D. L. (1997). Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 5(3), 223-248.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Shava, E., & Maramura, T. C. (2017). National Development Plan as an Entrepreneurial Mechanism for Rural Economic Development in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 9(2(J), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v9i2(J).1664

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Elvin Shava, Tafadzwa Clementine Maramura (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 9 No. 2(J) (2017) Banking, Stress & Financial Literacy View issue contents

Published

2017-05-18

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission