Author

  • Sibanisezwe Alwyn Khumalo

    • Rhodes University, Department of Economics and Economic History, South Africa
    • South Africa
  • Asrat Tsegaye

    • University of Fort Hare, Department of Economics, East London, South Africa
    • South Africa

Abstract

The study made use of the gravity model to analyze the behavior of South Africa’s trade patterns at industry level. Using SIC 2-digit level data for the period 1996-2013 based on two sub-samples, 1996-2004 and 2005-2013, the study found that trade liberalization was not universally influential on trade patterns. Some industries did not exhibit significant behavior changes as a result of tariff liberalization. The results show that Agriculture, mining ores, crude oil, machinery and transport are the only industries from the selected sample of nine that are significantly influenced by trade liberalization policy. Furthermore, empirical results indicate that trade liberalization hinders extensive margins and does not encourage intensive margins.

Keywords

References

  • Adenikinju, A. & Chete, L. (2002). Productivity, market structure and Trade liberalization in Nigeria. AERC Research paper, 126.
  • Anderson, J. E. & Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93, 170-192.
  • Appleyard, D., Field, A. & Cobb, S. (2008). International Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Black, A. (2001). Globalization and restructuring in the South African automotive industry. Journal of International Development, 13, 779-769.
  • Buono, I. & Lalanne, G. (2012). The effect of the Uruguay round on the intensive and extensive margins of trade. Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, 86 269-283.
  • Chen, W. (2013). The extensive and Intensive margin of exports: The role of innovation. The World Economy, 36(5), 607-635.
  • Debaere, P. & Mostashari, S. (2010). Do tariffs matter for the extensive margin of international trade: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 81, 163-169.
  • Fedderke, J. & Vaze, P. (2001). The nature of South Africa’s trade patterns by economic sector and the extent of trade liberalization during the course of the 1990’s. The South African Journal of Economics, 69.
  • Feenstra, R. & Taylor, A. (2014). International Economics, 3rd edition. New York Worth Publishers.
  • Fiestas, I. (2005). The effects of trade liberalization on growth, poverty and inequality. CILAE, nota tecnica.
  • Kanda, P. T. & Jordaan, A. C. (2010). Trade diversion and Trade creation: Augmented Gravity model study for South Africa. Trade & industrial policy strategies paper series 2010.
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. The American Economic Review, 70, 950-959.
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents. New York: Penguin group.
  • Twerefu, D. K. (2009). Mineral Exploitation, Environmental sustainability and sustainable development in EAC, SADC and ECOWAS regions. African trade policy centre, work in progress, 79.
  • Van der Westhuizen, C. (2006). Trade and poverty: A case study of SA clothing industry, Trade and poverty project, SALDRU, University of Cape Town.

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Khumalo, S. A., & Tsegaye, A. (2018). An Empirical Investigation of Trade Liberalization and Trade Patterns in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(5(J), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i5(J).2503

Share this article

Section

Research Paper

Published

2018-11-03

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission