Author

  • Sajitha Dishanka

    • Department of Business Economics, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
    • Sri Lanka

  • Takeshi Sakurai

    • Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Japan
    • Japan

  • Yukio Ikemoto

    • Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo, Japan
    • Japan

Abstract

Essentially, equity and efficiency are integral parts of any economic activities of sustainability though the correlation and causation between those two constructs are not considered significant. This study intends to evaluate if the contract farming system is a sustainable solution to the prevailing socio-economic aspects of the labor productivity problem in the tea estate sector of Sri Lanka, where female workers are highly depressed. This study has employed the survey strategy within the instrumental case of a selected tea estate to assess equity and efficiency of women-empowered contract farming system. The analytical results for gender equity on input and performance indicators have proven that gender equity is maintained in contract farming at the sample tea estate. The efficiency analysis results revealed that the output elasticity of tea bushes is significantly lower for female farmers than male farmers. However, there is no such significant difference revealed in the output elasticity of labor between gender groups. These findings explicitly reveal that the female workers in the tea estate sector are capable of managing labor although they are dominated by males in the domesticity. It further implies that a transformation of the male-dominant culture of the tea estate community would enhance the entrepreneurial and leadership capabilities of female workers if they are provided with equal opportunities and freedom.

Keywords

References

  • Adams, T., Gerber, J. D. & Amacker, M. (2019). Constraints and opportunities in gender relations: Sugarcane out-grower schemes in Malawi. World Development, 122, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.029
  • Adesina, A. A. & Djato, K. K. (1997). Relative efficiency of women as farm managers: Profit function analysis in Côte d'Ivoire. Agricultural Economics, 16(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(96)012121
  • Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., Htwe, N. M., San, S. S. & Raharjo, B. (2017). Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: A different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy, 69(C), 270-279. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
  • Alkire, S. & Deneulin, S. (2009). The human development and capability approach. In S. Deneulin, & L. Shahani, Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach, 22-48. London.
  • Anderson, C. L., Reynolds, T. W., Biscaye, P., Patwardhan, V. & Schmidt, C. (2021). Economic benefits of empowering women in agriculture: Assumptions and evidence. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1769071
  • Bellemare, M. F. (2015). Contract farming: What’s in it for smallholder farmers in developing countries? The Magazine of Food, Farm and Resource Issues, 30(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.208719
  • Bellemare, M. F. (2018). Contract farming: Opportunity cost and trade-offs. Agricultural Economics, 49(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12415
  • Brewin, S. & Murphy, S. (2019, February). The farmer and her husband: Legal innovations for women in contract farming. Investment in Agriculture, 8, 1-12.
  • Dishanka, S. & Ikemoto, Y. (2014). Social development and labor productivity: The problem and a solution for the tea plantation sector of Sri Lanka. Colombo Business Journal, 5(1), 67-80.
  • Dishanka, S. & Ikemoto, Y. (2018). Justice in the tea estate community in Sri Lanka: An explanation through freedom-based capability approach. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 9(1), 6-18. https://doi.org.10.22610/jsds.v9i1.2164
  • Faizi, A. A. & Shah, T. M. (2014). Contract farming and gender relations in India. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 2(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321024914534041
  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2001). Contract farming: Partnerships for growth. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin.
  • Gebre, G. G., Isoda, H., Rahut, D. B., Amekawa, Y. & Nomura, H. (2019). Gender differences in agricultural productivity: Evidence from maize farm households in Southern Ethiopia. GeoJournal, 86, 843-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10098-y
  • Glover, D. J. (1984). Contract farming and smallholder out-grower schemes in less-developed countries. World Development, 12(11/12), 1143-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90008-1
  • Ikemoto, Y. (2004). Coffee, poverty, and environment. (T. Sasaki, Ed.) Nature and Human Communities, 123151.
  • Key, N. & Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: The organization of agro-processing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27(2), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00144-2
  • Kirsten, J. & Sartorius, K. (2002). Linking agribusiness and small-scale farmers in developing countries: Is there a new role for contract farming? Development Southern Africa, 19(4), 503-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835022000019428
  • Mitra, A. & Rao, N. (2021). Contract farming, ecological change and the transformations of reciprocal gendered social relations in Eastern India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(2), 436-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1683000
  • Miyata, S., Minot, M. & Hu, D. (2009). Impact of contract farming on income: Linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Development, 37(11), 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
  • Morrison, P. S., Murray, W. E. & Ngidang, D. (2006). Promoting indigenous entrepreneurship through smallscale contract farming: The poultry sector in Sarawak, Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00253.x
  • Mwambi, M. M., Oduol, J., Mshenga, P. & Saidi, M. (2016). Does contract farming improve smallholder income? The case of avocado farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 6(1), 2-20.
  • Navarra, C. (2019). Contract farming in Mozambique: Implications for gender inequalities within and across rural households. South African Journal of Economics, 87(2), 228-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12222
  • Njuki, J. M., Kihiyo, V. B., O'Ktingati, A. & Place, F. (2006). Productivity differences between male and female managed farms in the eastern and central highlands of Kenya. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast.
  • Pannell, D. J. & Schilizzi, S. (1999). Sustainable agriculture: A matter of ecology, equity, economic efficiency or expedience? Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 13(4), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v13n04_06
  • Panotra, N., Gupta, V., Sharma, V. & Kumar, A. (2018). Contract Farming System for Sustainable Agricultural Development. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10(6), 5505-5508.
  • Philips, A. (2003). Rethinking culture and development: Marriage and gender among the tea plantation workers in Sri Lanka. Gender and Development, 11(2), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/741954313
  • Plumecocq, G., Debril, T., Duru, M., Magrini, M. B., Sarthou, J. P. & Therond, O. (2018). The plurality of values in sustainable agriculture models: diverse lock-in and coevolution patterns. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09881-230121
  • Quisumbing, A. R. (1996). Male-female differences in agricultural productivity: Methodological issues and empirical evidence. World Development, 24(10), 1579-1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305750X(96)00059-9
  • Rahman, S. (2010). Women’s labor contribution to productivity and efficiency in agriculture: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 318-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00243.x
  • Samarasinghe, V. (1993). Puppets on a string: Women’s wage work and empowerment among female tea plantation workers of Sri Lanka. The Journal of Developing Areas, 27(3), 329-340.
  • Shyamalie, H. W., Welala, N. N. & Godage, S. (2013). Viable alternative worker deployment models. The Experiment and Extension Forum. The Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka.
  • Singh, S. (2002). Contracting out solutions: Political economy of contract farming in the Indian Punjab. World Development, 30(9), 1621-1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00059-1
  • Tirado, A. A., Morales, M. R. & Calleros, O. L. (2015). Additional indicators to promote social sustainability within government programs: Equity and efficiency. Sustainability, 7(7), 9251-9267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7079251
  • Ul-Haq, M. (2003). The human development paradigm. In S. Fukuda-Parr, & A. K. Shiva Kumar, Readings in Human Development, 17-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K. & Schippers, J. (2010). Productivity of older workers: Perceptions of employers and employees. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00331.x
  • Warning, M. & Key, N. (2002). The social performance and distributional consequences of contract farming: An equilibrium analysis of the Arachide de Bouche Program in Senegal. World Development, 30(2), 255263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00104-8
  • White, B. (2012). Agriculture and the generation problem: Rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bulletin, 43(6), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.x

Downloads

No downloads have been recorded for this article yet. Figures appear here once readers begin downloading the full text.

How to Cite

Dishanka, S., Sakurai, T., & Ikemoto, Y. (2022). Equity and Efficiency in Women-Empowered Contract Farming: An Explanatory Case Study on the Tea Estate Sector of Sri Lanka. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 13(6(J), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v13i6(J).3263

Share this article

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Sajitha Dishanka, Takeshi Sakurai, Yukio Ikemoto (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.

Keywords

Section

Research Paper

Published in

Vol. 13 No. 6(J) (2021) Behavioural Economics, Tax Fairness & Gender Equity View issue contents

Published

2022-03-11

Submissions

Have research to publish? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies welcomes submissions.

Make a Submission